Evaluate Teachers? Let Students Also Do It

Governor Cuomo has political capital—why waste it on more reliance on standardized testing?

In more than 60 years reporting on public school districts here and in other cities, I’ve often found students to be useful evaluators of their teachers and schools.

During the current tumultuous debate on determining which teachers must be fired for incompetence, the New York City and State teachers’ unions are fiercely resisting the insistence of Governor Cuomo (now a self-declared lobbyist for students) and Mayor Bloomberg (always a lobbyist for himself) that a significant measuring base for teacher competence is student test scores.

Indeed, the ultimate decider, the boss—State Education Commissioner John King—has decreed, no matter what compromises are achieved, “teachers whose students don’t improve on standardized tests are prohibited from receiving good ratings.”


So, there will be no input from students with long-range direct knowledge of their teachers. One such high school student, Nikhil Goyal, in the January 26 New York Times letters column is nonetheless being heard. He writes: “It’s time to acknowledge that test scores are not a correct indicator in determining quality teachers.” I would add: Teachers who change students’ lives are those whose students love learning.

That quality can be determined when a teacher knows each of his or her students and the problems each might have in learning. You can’t find that out, Goyal says, “by their students’ ability to fill in bubbles.”

Confirming this real-life, real-time analysis in a January 29 letter to the Times (part of my education is in letters columns) Randi Priluck, a professor and director of learning assessment at Pace University’s Lubin School of Business, tells Cuomo and Bloomberg: “Testing, particularly standardized testing, does nothing to enhance knowledge and hinders the development of an appreciation for learning that should begin in school and last a lifetime.”

What can really change students’ lives while they’re in school is getting the confidence in themselves that they can learn and then begin to frequently experience the joy of learning.

I wouldn’t be surprised if Andrew Cuomo knows that from his own life—and not from taking standardized tests. But now, with his brimming confidence in himself as he’s talked of as a future presidential candidate, along with such plaudits as the January 28 tribute in The Economist to his record as governor (“Next, walk on water”), he champions himself as an educational reformer, demanding that teachers be measured, in large part, by their students’ standardized-test scores. Think again, governor.

Now let’s go to one of this city’s teachers who strongly agrees with her union’s attack on students’ collective test scores deciding who gets fired.

In a January 21 letter to the New York Daily News, Kris Tapper writes: “As a teacher for almost 20 years, the last five in the city schools, I have no objections to being evaluated. However, I would like to see the parent-home component evaluated as well. Let’s remember that students spend only about seven hours a day in school. As a teacher, I can’t guarantee that every home environment is conducive to a student’s maximum learning potential. For this, I should not be held accountable.”

I agree with her up to a point. But Cuomo, Bloomberg, and her union should be held accountable for their not learning what more schools and systems across the nation are actually doing to learn about students’ home environments. And also adding to their schools’ medical care for students’ hearing, vision, and other health problems, some of which also might not be cared for in their home environments.

Has this need yet begun to be a demanding concern for our Education Mayor and Chancellor Dennis Walcott? (The latter is indeed beginning to pay other active attention to students with special needs.)

As for Bloomberg, he wants to reward highly effective teachers with $20,000 raises. But you say, your honor, that these raises will be based largely on standardized-test scores? Bad move.

And dig this from the Daily News, January 28: “Bloomberg also seeks to axe half the teachers at the city’s 33 lowest performing schools, which could free up $60 million in federal funding for the city.”

The reporter doesn’t mention the high percentage of black and Hispanic students in those schools who will be affected by the sweep of the mayor’s ax.

Obama’s education secretary, Arne Duncan, is a big fan of standardized tests, like the mayor, but has it occurred to either of them to talk to the students in those schools to find out whether individual students are benefiting from the fact that some schools on the doomed list have actually demonstrated improvement in more than a few of these students?

Yoav Gonen, an excellent education reporter at the New York Post reports on January 24: “Seven of the 33 schools where the city is seeking to fire half of the staff were rated an ‘A’ or ‘B’ on their latest city-issued report cards, a review by the Post found. That means roughly 260 teachers are slated to be cleared out from schools that were celebrated just last fall for making significant gains.”

Next Page »
My Voice Nation Help

the school 'only" has the kids 7 hrs a day ? compare that to the 30 minutes to and hour per week a parent in the modern family spends actually educating or communicating. i enjoyed this article. it reminds me a bit of the author, john taylor gatto, who also despised the grading and testing he was forced to do as a nyc teacher.

Jojo Wozz
Jojo Wozz

I am a 27 years old doctor,mature and beautiful. and now i am seeking a good man who can give me real love, so i got a sername Andromeda2002 on Agedate.СòM, a nice and free place for younger women and older men,or older women and younger men, to interact with each other.Maybe you wanna check out or tell your friends.


mу сlаssmаtе's stер-аunt mаkеs $74 аn hоur оn thе lарtор. Shе hаs bееn оut оf wоrк fоr 9 mоnths but lаst mоnth hеr inсоmе wаs $8524 јust wоrкing оn thе lарtор fоr а fеw hоurs. Rеаd mоrе оn this wеb sitе... С А S Н S Н А R Р . С О М


Let get real. Education is not about education but containment. The power that be doesn't want to educate black and brown children to compete with white kids for scare jobs that are headed to China. Schools for other people children is mostly a pipeline for the prison and wlefare system when 50 percent of African students fail to graduate. and 50 percent of those who go to college.

Nick Jordan
Nick Jordan

This is COMPLETELY false -- I work endlessly to improve my students writing, their comprehension, and their critical thinking skills in my Language Arts class. Trust me, the kids know who is 'really' teaching versus who is just posing whenever the evaluators are in the room. I think this is a pretty good idea -- but don't start spewing forth this kind of stuff about 'all' teachers because I really love my job and try to make a difference.

New York Concert Tickets