Top

news

Stories

 

Boy Soldier of Fortune

A celebrated memoir threatens to blow into a million little pieces

Ishmael Beah, the author of a powerful memoir about his time as a child soldier in Sierra Leone, may have made one major tactical mistake in writing his book. Explaining why he was able to remember his horrific experiences in such detail, Beah wrote that he has a photographic memory that allows him to "indelibly" recall the events in his life. So once critics, over the course of the last two months, began to raise questions about the validity of certain events described in his book, the 27-year-old author, who now lives in Brooklyn, had less room to maneuver than if he'd simply said he'd done his best to remember things as accurately as possible.

Columbia University professor Neil Boothby has examined enough child-soldier tales to question Beah’s.
Stacy Kranitz
Columbia University professor Neil Boothby has examined enough child-soldier tales to question Beah’s.

That book, A Long Way Gone (published by Farrar, Straus & Giroux), has not only sold 700,000 copies and captured a coveted endorsement from the Starbucks coffee chain; it has made Beah an international celebrity, and brought the whole ugly issue of child soldiers into the public consciousness. The book is scheduled to come out in paperback in August, and it is a finalist for a Los Angeles Times Book Prize.

Beah writes about his village being attacked in 1993, about his parents being killed, and how he was forced to wander the country as a refugee until he was absorbed into an army unit, where he became a ruthless, drug-addled killing machine. The story ends with his rescue, his transfer into a UNICEF refugee camp, and his eventual emigration to the United States, where he attended a private high school in Manhattan. He then went off to Oberlin College, where the work he did in writing classes eventually became the manuscript for his book. Since its publication, he has become a kind of unofficial spokesman on the plight of child soldiers, working with UNICEF and Human Rights Watch, and giving lectures here and overseas.

Out of the depths of the suffering descibed in the book, Beah's story goes, he emerged a transformed and redeemed person, and one who was looking forward to a considerably brighter future than his former comrades in Sierra Leone.

In January, however, the Sydney-based newspaper The Australian began a series of articles documenting discrepancies in the timeline of Beah's tale. The newspaper also called into question whether two of the central anecdotes had even happened at all.

In one instance, Beah describes in vivid detail a deadly brawl between two rival factions of child soldiers in a UNICEF-run camp in the Sierra Leone capital of Freetown in January of 1996. Six teens died, Beah recalls—but The Australian could find no one in Freetown who could remember the incident, and no official report of the fight. Reporters who covered the civil war told The Australian that it would have gotten enormous attention at the time.

In the other instance, Beah opens his book with an account of the attack on his village of Mattru Jong, which forced him to flee into the countryside as a refugee. He claims the attack took place in January of 1993. But The Australian reports that the battle he describes took place in January of 1995, not 1993. The paper found school officials who remember Beah attending the local school in 1993 and 1994, and said there were school records to confirm it.

This is significant, because Beah claims that he was wandering the countryside and then fighting in the army during this period.

The Australian also spoke with Kabba Williams, a former child soldier himself. Now a student and activist in Sierra Leone, Williams agreed that Beah was a soldier, but only in 1995. Williams added that he has difficulty recalling the details of his own ordeal.

But for all the work these Australian reporters have done on the scene in West Africa, only the barest details of their investigation have made the American papers. When The New York Times broke the news that another memoir, Love and Consequences—the tale of a white woman's experiences growing up in a black gang in Los Angeles—was a fabrication, the newspaper aggressively went after its author, Margaret Seltzer, and her publishers with multiple stories that only seemed to reflect how badly the Times had been duped in an earlier lifestyle feature on Seltzer.

The Times heavily promoted A Long Way Gone as well, running an extended excerpt from Beah's book in its Sunday magazine last year. But for some reason, the paper has printed only a couple of paragraphs about the questions concerning its veracity.

"The story is very hard to verify, because he rarely puts a date with a place with a name," said Peter Wilson, the Australian reporter who did the legwork in Sierra Leone that raised the central questions about the book. Wilson said that he sent a list of 20 questions on matters of basic fact to Beah's publisher, among them a request for the full name of at least one child soldier with whom Beah had served. Wilson has yet to receive a direct response to any those questions. "If he would answer some of these questions, it would clear everything up," Wilson said. "Why not just deal with them?"

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next Page >>
 
  • Lindsay_Smith 02/07/2012 5:29:00 PM

    "I think what [Beah] has done is meet with UNICEF, journalists, and others, and he told stories, and people responded to certain stories enthusiastically," Boothby said. "That has encouraged him to come out with an account that has sensationalism, a bit of bravado, and some inaccuracies.” This is an assumption not a fact. What are you basing this on? I could assume that Boothby sat down with his professor friends, journalists friends and others and figured out how best he could discredit the story to bring more light to the fact that he is a so-called “specialist” in this area. Does my assumption have any grounds? Some would say: it does. But all would agree that an assumption is not a fact and that assumptions have never been trusted in a rule of law society (thankfully). “Wilson said. "Just look at the pacing of the book: He takes 100 pages to describe the 10 months, 20 or 30 pages to describe the two years as a child soldier, and then reverts to the original pacing once he reaches the refugee camp."” Is Wilson arguing here that there’s a scientific formula to narrate stories? If so, please let’s ask Wilson to present us with the formula and provide us with a comparative analysis of books that all follow it, then we can take him seriously. I doubt there is such a formula though. My experience taught me that traumatized people do not extend on their trauma whether it is orally or in writing. My experience can easily rebut Wilson’s presumptuous statement based on, noticeably, nothing. "Without question, these things happen," he said. "But it's very unlikely that all of that bad stuff would happen to one kid. Any story [with that kind of] blank-slate horror has to be called into question." Could you please develop what the person base this statement on? Is it based on some report from an official source that is not debated? Or is it based on this person's perception of the % of bad "stuff" that can happen to one person? It seems to me that it's based on the latter, which is deplorable to use as a source in a newspaper. "Amani M'Bale, an official with the humanitarian organization CARE in Sierra Leone, told theVoice that the book does depict experiences common to child soldiers in Africa. But she added that she cannot speak to its credibility." How could this person speak to its credibility? Based on what ground? I don’t understand how this argument speaks to your theory. “Wilson said that he also found a dozen people in the town who insist that the battle took place in 1995” What did the other people surveyed say? Did they say “they don’t remember” or did they say “it happened in 1993”? Then Wilson’s argument can be evaluated, standing alone, it’s biased, just like the rest of this article. “But Wilson is an award-winning reporter who was once named Australian journalist of the year and has served in Iraq.” It doesn’t matter what awards won Wilson. After all, there are presidents running countries who are mad-men, does the fact that they made it to President justify the fact they are “efficient”? Certainly not. Besides, just like Wilson has been questioning Beah’s good character, one should be allowed to dig into Wilson’s path and question his good character as well, then only this argument will stand. I should stop here because this article is clearly based on assumptions, stories and subjective opinions and certainly not on hard evidence. It is sad to see that the investigative nature of journalism has weakened this much.

  • Kerrie 03/24/2010 9:34:00 PM

    Oh come on the boy was in his early teens when this all happened! Why does everyone have to get all bent out of shape because there are not a lot of specific dates that you can "look up" to verify what he says. I think that people need to get lives and let this man, Ishmael, tell his life as a child soldier. Why is it so hard to accept the fact that it happened? Things like this go on all over the world. And just because it is not documented somewhere that "A REAL WAR" happened, doesnt mean that it didnt. Leave this man alone. It makes me sick, all of you news people want to discredit someone to make your name stronger, so people will remember you as the one who discredited Ishmael Beah. Cant you see, all that he wants to do is raise awarness to this situation and keep other children safe. You people make me sick!

  • Sere 06/26/2009 3:43:00 PM

    Sorry but i think it's better to discuss about what we can do,pragmatically, to avoid that there are child soldiers in 2009, than to speak if Ishmael was a soldier for two months or two years. Probably Ishmael was a soldier for two months or problably not, we are not sure, BUT "what does change?", child soldiers keep dying.

 

Most Popular Stories


Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy