The Return of ROTC to Columbia

Military training programs could return to the campus, four decades after they were banned

After months of debate, Columbia University is poised to reverse its 42-year ban on military recruiters and training programs on campus. On Friday, the University Senate approved a resolution to explore inviting back the Reserve Officers Training Corps program to campus. The resolution now goes to the University’s Board of Trustees for final approval.

The resolution, which first became public last month, after it was leaked on student blogs, reads: “Columbia University welcomes the opportunity to explore further mutually beneficial relationships with the Armed Forces of the United States, including participation in the programs of the Reserve Officers Training Corps.” The student-run Coalition Opposed to ROTC immediately issued a statement declaring the resolution to be “flawed and politically biased,” and decrying what it called the “highly undemocratic process” that led to this point.

For Columbia, the prospect of bringing back ROTC recalls a four-decade legacy of protests against a military presence on campus. In the first half of the 20th century, Columbia was actually a hotbed of military recruiting: During World War II, its Naval Midshipman’s School is reputed to have graduated more naval officers than the Naval Academy. All that changed in the mid-1960s, though, as students began voicing their opposition to the Vietnam War by protesting Naval ROTC graduation ceremonies. In the spring of 1968, student demonstrations and anti–Vietnam War sentiment brought the entire university to a standstill, as radical students took over buildings and set fire to parts of the campus.

ARTIST: Cojo is an art-world antihero whose work has been printed in international magazines. He is currently working on a painting series based on a year-long fine-art experiment ( (
ARTIST: Cojo is an art-world antihero whose work has been printed in international magazines. He is currently working on a painting series based on a year-long fine-art experiment ( (

“Naval ROTC was an obvious symbol of Columbia’s involvement in the war in Vietnam,” says Mark Rudd, one of the student leaders of the 1968 revolt. “Attacking the ROTC became a useful way to attack the war itself.”

After reviewing the events and student sentiment, the University Council of Columbia University, the governing body at the time, passed a resolution in 1969 terminating Columbia’s relationship with the Navy. Even after the Vietnam War ended, student opposition to military programs remained high, and after President Clinton issued his “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” directive in 1993, Columbia and several other universities, including Dartmouth, Yale, Harvard, and Stanford, based their continued refusal to allow ROTC on campus on the grounds that military policy violated their own anti-discrimination rules.

Columbia students are not currently barred from enrolling in ROTC, but they must go off-campus for their military training. The Army runs a ROTC program at Fordham University in the Bronx, and the Air Force headquarters its program at Manhattan College. Columbia students interested in the Marines Officer Candidate School can attend sessions in Quantico, Virginia, during the summer months.

During their time at Columbia, students take military science classes and engage in training exercises to learn leadership skills. Cadets receive a scholarship of up to $17,000 to use toward their Columbia tuition, and receive an additional $250 and $400 per month in stipends. Upon graduation, they join the military as officers; the Army ROTC, according to its figures, produces 75 percent of all Army officers.

The commute to Fordham is onerous, but that isn’t the main reason for bringing the program back to campus, according to Jose Robledo, a Columbia College student in economics and political science who is one of the university’s 10 students currently enrolled in Army ROTC. “It’s more of a symbolic engagement that would happen on campus,” as students are exposed to people who are supportive of the military, he says.

Many in the anti-ROTC camp were concerned that having an on-campus ROTC would imply the university endorsed the military and approved of its activities. Noting a number of recent U.S. military action that may be considered “immoral and illegal by international law,” Bruce Robbins, a professor of English and comparative literature, expressed his concerns during a March 8 panel discussion at Columbia’s School of International and Public Affairs: “We have a moral obligation to do everything we can to prevent people from thinking [military practices are] natural and normal.”

Opponents of ROTC also worried that program instructors could hold professor rank while not being subject to university rules, or that students would receive academic credit for their military classes, as is the case at some other colleges. “I do not object to Columbia students in ROTC, but I do not want Columbia University to sponsor it,” Columbia astronomy professor David Helfand said at the SIPA panel.

Columbia’s Task Force on Military Engagement—a group of students, faculty, and administrators convened last December to solicit campus opinion on a return of ROTC—issued its 228-page final report on March 4. It found that 60 percent of the students who responded supported having some form of on-campus ROTC. However, the report also directed that any ROTC classes should not give academic credit unless the class was open to all the students, and that ROTC instructors should not be considered part of the faculty unless the university hired them and they are subject to university policies. (The leaked draft of the University Senate resolution indicated that the university would retain control of course credits and instructor status, but this was omitted from the final version.)

Despite his continued opposition to the military as “a machine for global domination,” and his role in getting ROTC kicked out in the first place, Rudd has mixed feelings about having the program back on campus. The military has changed since the Vietnam War, for one thing, and is now an all-volunteer organization.

Next Page »
My Voice Nation Help
Sort: Newest | Oldest

(1) mark rudd is nothing but an elderly ex TERRORIST sympathizer, whose buddies blew up a building in nyc (sounds familiar?)

(2) kinky sex fairs ok at many colleges.

(3) freedom of speech...assholes! even a 1960s Dragnet episode had how cops/conservatives should be given the same rights rudd and TERRORISTS have.


ROTC allows students enrolled to wear uniforms. The campus is very international group, and american uniforms may be very disturbing, even traumatizing to those students who have lived in countries where America has been the agressor, killing innocent civiians. We have students from Iraq for example, who are troubled by this, as well as from other countries where these feelings are very strong. Also, why is it so difficult for an ROTC student to take a subway 4 stops to take their military classes. Many students in science have internships at labs which require them to take a train. Other students are involved in community service activities where they must travel. ROTC has been on Columbia's campus for years, and those 10 Students are getting the liberal arts education for which they signed up. The only think they have to do is take a subway 4 stops. Not so difficult for Mr. Jose Robledo.



yeah, americans have no fucking rights---only illegal aliens in USA have rights. USA's citizens should cater to some fuckin foreigner, in USA.

(and mark rudd's TERRORIST buddies blew up a bldg in nyc in the 1970s.)

New York Concert Tickets