By Jared Chausow
By Katie Toth
By Elizabeth Flock
By Albert Samaha
By Anna Merlan
By Jon Campbell
By Jon Campbell
By Albert Samaha
Riding the poll
This is it? No critics' poll? No hilarious bits about every serious movie of the year? No debate? No fringe defenses of indefensible movies? Wow! I ignored the sinking quality of the paper for some time, but this . . . Your annual film roundup used to be the most comprehensive guide to the following six months of DVD renting. The Village Voice is dead. Long live Another Corporate Voice.
What happened to the annual film poll that the Voice has been featuring for the last five years or so? Is it yet to come? Did it appear in another publication? Let me know.
Thanks for Patrick Winn's "Dipset's Parole Model" [January 39]. Our prayers are with Freekey Zekey, and we look forward to Book of Ezekiel. We hope that it will tell his side of the story. Ezekiel, according to the Bible, is one of the prophets in whom God found favor. We are sure God has found favor in Freekey Zekey a/k/a Ezekiel Jiles because he has given him time to complete a mission to tell the world about his blessings. We pray that he will tell of all he has received from God.
The article on Freekey Zekey is well written; however, the title is off base. He is not on parole, nor is he rallying for the position of role model.
As a journalist and editor myself, I'm disappointed that the correlation between title and article wasn't thought out a little better than that.
I am also Zeke's publicist, so of course it's in my and his best interest for his media coverage to be accurate. Zeke was enthusiastic and happy during his conversations with Patrick Winn, and there were several very bright, colorful, and happy pictures of him in the photo shoot he did. I understand that you're in the business of selling papers, and the title along with the dark, menacing photo of him does grab attention. However, the tone of the title is not really what the text of the article was going for.
Re "Putting God in His Place" [Nat Hentoff, January 39]: Bravo to Matthew LaClair. He should be cloned and allowed to attend every school in the United States. However, this situation comes up not only in our schools, or in White House policy, but also in the inclusion of God and Christianity in local government theater. Far beyond the pledge of allegiance and the slogan on our money, the interweaving of church and state in local politics has made it such that those of us who protest this combination are labeled heathens. This reminds me of when our hair (when we had hair) was long and our views were labeled Communistic, when all we have ever wanted was to protect the Constitution and the freedoms it guarantees.
Knightdale, North Carolina
I am writing in reference to Jarrett Murphy's "Kick Out the Jams" [January 39] in which I was quoted. Many people have the misimpression promoted by the congestion-pricing advocates that the number of vehicles entering the Manhattan Central Business District (CBD) is increasing. The statistics show that is not the case. In fact, over the last 10 years the average number of cars entering the CBD remained unchanged despite an increase in the population during that same period. The MTA reports that ridership, during the same period, on the LIRR and the MTA is up. There is no need to bludgeon residents of the outer boroughs with a congestion tax when the demographics indicate most already choose mass transit when it is available. The problem we have in Queens is that we do not have sufficient bus and subway service. Don't punish us. Instead, build a subway and bus service that is accessible to all residents.
Joshua E. Bienstock
Jackson Heights, New York
Jarrett Murphy's article quotes the success of the London congestion charge. The only success has been PR. The number of vehicles entering the London toll cordon is down, but neither the congestion nor the air pollution in London has fallen. Most of the original daily charge of (nearly $10) was swallowed up in the costs of running the scheme, and the daily charge has been increased to (nearly $20). The charge has resulted in a fall in business for restaurants and smaller stores. The area covered by the London charge is to be extended later this year. Almost nobody wants this extension apart from the mayor. None of us like congestion, but only a fool would want to pay for it.