By Steve Weinstein
By Devon Maloney
By Tessa Stuart
By Alison Flowers
By Albert Samaha
By Jesse Jarnow
By Eric Tsetsi
By Raillan Brooks
If every dog has his day, July 24 was DJ the German shepherd'sbecause that's when a federal jury cleared the NYPD K-9 of police-brutality allegations.
On August 6, 2004, the Czech-born DJ led his NYPD handler and two detectives to William Bryant and Emmanuel Blake, then both 16, who were hiding in an air vent after breaking into a sub-basement of a maintenance garage in the Marcus Garvey Houses in Brooklyn. Police assert that the teens were looking to steal yard equipment (see "Reality Bites," July 25).
Bryant and Blake claim that after they were pulled separately from the ventand while they were being held down by detectives Bill Unger and Danny SpragueOfficer Lawrence Zacarese sicced DJ on them. Bryant suffered a four-inch cut to the back of his knee, while Blake received puncture wounds to his arm and was bitten on the face.
Claiming the dog attack was in retaliation for making the officers tromp through a sewage-strewn and rat-filled basementand not because they were resisting arrest, as the police allegedBrooklyn-based attorney Andrew Stoll sued on behalf of Bryant and Blake, arguing that the attack violated their constitutional rights.
But the duo turned out to have a dog's chance of ever seeing a penny, much less the $5 million they were each seeking.
Following a six-day trial in Manhattan's federal court, a jury of eight took less than two hours to find that Zacarese, Unger, and Sprague did not violate the men's rights, essentially clearing DJ, who has been forced into retirement by a congenital disease and is now Zacarese's personal pet.
"It's very difficult to get people to see past the hero-and-villain mentality," Stoll says. "Every line out of [the city attorneys'] mouths was how dangerous the officers' jobs are and what criminals my guys are."
Blake's and Bryant's criminal records didn't help. Neither did the fact that they incessantly clowned around with each other during courtroom sidebars. Nor could it have been a good thing that one of the jurorswho kept smiling at the officersis dating an NYPD officer.
"At the end of the day, we had a somewhat sympathetic case, but not very sympathetic plaintiffs," Stoll said. "It's difficult to ask a jury to consider that even someone who committed a crime can have their rights violated."
Frances Sands, deputy chief of the Special Federal Litigation Division for the city's Corporation Council, said they were "pleased" with the verdict. "The jury recognized that there was no excessive force, no assault, and no battery in this case, and that the three officers acted properly." Make that three officers and one canine colleague.