Top

news

Stories

 

Andrew Cuomo and Fannie and Freddie

How the youngest Housing and Urban Development secretary in history gave birth to the mortgage crisis

Experts point out that borrowers usually have no idea that such a thing exists. In fact, Harvard law professor Howell Jackson discovered that the HUD booklet on settlement costs, issued for distribution to borrowers on Cuomo's watch, never mentions YSPs or how they are financed. "You may wish to ask about the fees that the mortgage broker will receive for its services" is as close as the booklet gets. "Critically absent," concludes Jackson, "is disclosure of the fact that the borrower finances the cost of YSPs through higher monthly mortgage payments." In 1997, Cuomo's proposed rule said that "a consensus" on only one point emerged from the negotiations with the department's broadly based advisory group, namely that "a rule should require that mortgage brokers inform borrowers of the role that they are serving early enough in the transaction to allow the consumer to shop for alternatives." Cuomo's final rule, much like the GSE edict, concluded: "This statement does not mandate disclosures beyond those currently required."

Glaser acknowledged that YSPs are a big cause of the crisis, though he pointedly insisted that they were "not the biggest," and he blamed them on Bush. He pointed out that Mel Martinez issued a YSP rule in late 2001, and claimed that he did so because Cuomo's ruling permitted class-action lawsuits. In fact, courts around the country had denied class-action certifications based on Cuomo's ruling, but a circuit court in Alabama decided that Cuomo's regulations were "ambiguous," which is why Martinez then issued what he called a "clarification" of the Cuomo regulations. But as a San Francisco circuit court found shortly thereafter, the Martinez clarification essentially "reiterated" Cuomo's position and "carries forward the same principles." A dissenting member of the same California panel deplored Cuomo's ruling and said "the phrase 'yield spread premium' " was a "way of avoiding calling a kickback a kickback."

The sad fact is that Cuomo's surrender on YSPs can't be excused as an unfortunate consequence of well-motivated policy, as his defenders have argued regarding his FHA and GSE actions. He has no cover for this one; it exposes him as an agent of special interests. And looking at his GSE and FHA policies through the lens of his retreat on these payoffs (which even Glaser, in a marked change from his MBA days, now condemns) suggests a pattern of compromised judgments.

With Martinez, who was hailed at a $250,000 fundraiser co-chaired by superlobbyist felon Jack Abramoff right after he stepped down as secretary, and Jackson, who is an FBI target now, following him at HUD, Cuomo was, in some respects, the last chance that borrowers had before the crisis hit. The grand ambitions unleashed when he orchestrated his father's win at such an early age propelled him to HUD's helm at a similarly early age, and convinced him to run for governor before he was ready. He seems more comfortable at 50 in the state attorney general's office than he has ever appeared in his public life, but the country will be living with his HUD mistakes, ill- or well-intended, for a long time to come.

<< Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
 
  • TheDoofster 09/24/2010 6:59:00 PM

    So to conclude: the process was driven by money (profit, lobbying, steering legislation) as well as misguided social engineering (singling out racial/ethnic/cultural groups to benefit from mortgages)? The yield-spread is a red-herring: don't banks do the same thing themselves ('here's my cost of funds, here's YOUR rate')? And you either qualify for $XXX per month or not--the spread has nothing to do with this! Banks lobbying (and getting) the overturn of post-Depression regulatory safeguards puts the gov't at fault. And did we forget about bank deregulation that allowed them to stack risk on risk, package and rate their own mortgage securities then have their investment agencies sell them to bank customers?!This is what happens when you use the gov't as a tool for giveaways...and when Congress is for sale.

  • Glenn Koons 09/24/2010 12:35:00 AM

    Perhaps the newest polls showing Carl and Joe near the two hugely progressive tax and spend Dems might just jar voters into realizing Andy is a phony who is depending on his Daddy's name to fool some of the dumbed down voters. Why would voters put another failed progressive economic dunce into power? Time to wipe out the mistakes made in 2008.

  • Joshua Posner 09/21/2010 3:34:00 AM

    Cuomo deserves some of the blame and should take responsibility for his role at HUD as it relates to the crash. Although he was there at the start of push for Fannie & Freddie to buy more subprimes, the next administration had 8 years to correct the situation, assuming they thought something was wrong. Apparently the Bush team wanted to promote a high level of home ownership too and I'm curious to know how many subprimes Fannie & Freddie bought annually from 1997 on. After that, lets not forget that brokers pushed these loans, banks made these loans, others bought those loans, investment banks sold them as securities which were rated by major rating agencies. All in all, a lot of money changed hands with bonuses and kickbacks along the way.

  • Renee 09/16/2010 10:57:00 PM

    BRAVOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Kgm 07/14/2010 10:58:00 AM

    More Bush bashing in these comments. Shows how much imagination you have. If anything goes wrong for Democrats, fall back on blaming Bush. This problem goes back years and years, Clinton made it worse but is far from one Presidents fault.

  • Mel 06/05/2010 1:51:00 AM

    This Andrew Cuomo is a menace to hard working people.He blamed the mortgage Brokers for the down fall of the Mortgage industry when all along it ws his fault as well as the bankers and Wall Street. He destroied thousand of lives and hurt a whole industry just to hide his incompentance and his buddies. Now he wants to run for governor, to do what destroy NY State like he did with the financial world?

  • peterpan 04/11/2010 11:48:00 PM

    Worst article ever.

  • christine Warner 03/16/2010 9:10:00 PM

    check it out

  • christine Warner 03/16/2010 9:09:00 PM

    Check it out

  • Paul 02/28/2010 1:26:00 AM

    This article is very misleading. I would recommend reading Joseph Stiglitz' new book "Freefall." Stiglitz is a noted economist who has a much better grasp on this than this writer. The main problem was securitization which let banks keep making bad loans that they didn't care about because they subsequently sold them off to other firms for huge sums before the shit hit the fan. Furthermore, reserve requirements were gutted under the Bush Administration so that banks could be leveraged 30 to 1, meaning that for very one dollar in assets, thirty could be lent out. This is what precipitated the fall of Lehmen Brothers and the banking crisis - they had no cash reserves to recoup what they had lost in real estate. That was the whole point of the bailout - to recapitalize these banks. It was not granting home loans to people in poor neighborhoods. Indeed, most of the foreclosures were in middle income California, Florida, and Arizona suburban neighborhoods, not in the inner cities. The author of this piece should know this.

  • Dennis 01/05/2010 8:50:00 PM

    Thanks to those wanted more homeownership, encouraged us to be involved in the housing industy, allowed us to work for years, and now we are bankrupt. No wonder we're seeing more and more suicides. Yes, thanks assholes.

  • 03/23/2009 7:07:00 PM

    Mr. Barrett did this time really a very, very, very poor work. It would take page after page to demonstrate how ludicrous most of the allegations as well as the the logical and the professional thinking chain is. Mr. Cuomo was right to raise the goals in favor of more support for low-income families, for the poor and for minorities. An icrease from a set goal of 42% to 50% did not change the face of the business the way Mr. Barrett tries to convince us in his very private and personal onslaught on Mr. Cuomo. Fine, Mr. Cuomo has set a revised set of goals in 2000 and didn't FORMALLY require a more detailed monitoring of the loans business. But HUD received significantly more data from the GSEs on voluntary grounds. And let us not forget: Mr. Cuomo left HUD on January 21, 2001, before any change in procedures and business practice were really implemented. The one who supervised implementation and policies around the changes was his follower. He was responsible of making sure thet the monitorind and control mechanisms are adequate and get steadily optimized. And don't forget: Cuomo left office with 1.2 billions in subprime loans. The huge increase took place under the new Bush admin who pushed much more virulently the move into subprime in order to make housing more affordable for the "poor": In 2000 just 1.2 bill., 2001 already 9.1 and 2002 already 15.1 bill. So don't blame everything on your most preffered object of hatred, Andrew Cuomo ...

  • HadEnough 02/19/2009 8:43:00 AM

    All this and Cuomo's name is being floated to be our next governor. What a history this guy has - thanks for sharing some of his deeds. We need to be informed voters with objectivity. Getting full and accurate histories of candidates are crucial - maybe there's someone out there who has true character - someone who we can be proud of and not make excuses for their behavior.

  • Franrose O. 12/15/2008 12:32:00 PM

    As we all know, being poor and rich is a fact of life. Some are lucky enough not to be spending time turning to payday loans just for them to get through financial diffuculties, while some are not fortunate enough and sometimes even live from paycheck to paycheck. I advice those people who are in financial trouble to take a lot of time on big decisions. The biggest obstacles to the good life are complications from how you manage your finances. Reported in a recent article published in the Wall Street Journal, Merrill Lynch CEO John Thain is out to get a $10 million bonus payment. This is after the company he was hired to run had almost completely run out of cash, and was facing bankruptcy. The situation was so desperate he had to eventually sell the company to Bank of America to keep the currency flowing. New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has called it �nothing less than shocking,� and that is a fair assessment, to adequately put it. It�s rare for any of us to be rewarded for failure. In fact, most would most likely get fired. These big-time executives should be receiving the same treatment as the average person in this country. Why should they be rewarded for their help causing the global economic disaster? Greed is the last thing we need during this critical time. However, if you need help to cover a sudden cash emergency, don�t sell yourself to Bank of America. Keep in mind you still have other options you can work with such as payday loans. Click here to learn more about Payday Loans.

  • Penny 10/02/2008 7:25:00 AM

    Have you heard? Cuomo bullies this woman in the city and he's being called a misogynist. It figures. He uses strong arm tactics to get what he wants.

  • JOHN CHINN 09/24/2008 2:22:00 AM

    I HAVEN'T READ FULLY NOR AS I LIKE TO DO RE-READ WHAT YOU HAVE WRITTEN ON CUOMO. SKETCHING IT ,I HAVE TO ASK: WHERE THE HELL WERE YOU FOLKS 25 TO 30 YEARS AGO WHEN THE REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS ALL ACROSS THIS NATION WERE TRYING DESPERATELY TO TELL THE NATION FANNIE MAE AND FREDIE MAC WERE TAKING THIS COUNTRY, THE TAX PAYER AND THE UNBORN CHILDREN , FOR A DISASTROUS RIDE. THE ANSWER IS VERY LIKELY THAT THE VILLAGE VOICE DID NOT HAVE THE VOICE IT HAS TODAY WITH THE ADVENT OF THE INTERNET. I DOUBT THAT IT WAS AS MUFFLED AS THE VOICE OF THE APPRAISER BUT STILL DROWNED IN A DIN OF POLITICAL IGNORANCE AND MONEY GRUBBING. HITTING THE HIGH SPOTS OF YOUR ARTICLE TELLS ME YOU ARE BASICALLY ON TO THE SOURCE OF THE PROBLEM. THEN AND NOW. SADLY THE SOURCES OF THE PROBLEM ARE IN CHARGE OF "FIXING IT" ? I WILL COMMENT SOME MORE WHEN I HAVE DONE THE ARTICLE THE JUSTICE OF A CLOSE READ AND RE-READ. MY GOD. CUOMO ! NEXT IT WILL BE AL CAPONE FOR SAINTHOOD.

  • Mike 08/21/2008 3:19:00 AM

    Others have already commented that this piece is way too simplistic in outlying causes of this crisis and is blaming Mr. Cuomo a bit too much. My focus is on the YSP. The misinformation in this article is comical. First, let's define the YSP. The YSP is money that is given to the mortgage broker by the bank for originating a loan. It is laid out clearly in the good faith estimate, and is often about 0.5% to 2% of the loan amount. The bank pays, not the borrower. And it is also incorrect to say that brokers use this to sucker folks into higher rates. Let's give an example. A broker may be able to offer a 6% interest rate with 1 point YSP and a 5.625% with no YSP. Rest assured the borrower will not be able to find a 5.625% on his/her own. The local retail bank will also charge around 6%. 5.625% is the WHOLESALE rate. So this higher rate is not higher at all than what is already out there. And the barriers to entry for entering the loan brokerage business is quite low, so there is plenty of competition, and borrowers can easily compare brokers to get the best rate. What the writer of the article is implying is that brokers should work for free without commission. That makes sense, doesn't it. And by the way, banks get paid for loans as well, those are called SRPs. The only problem is that banks do NOT have to report these fees to borrowers, whereas brokers do. That is the true unfairness. Outlying YSPs would force brokers to charge customers, whereas banks can continue to get their spreads in the back and do no cost loans. To outlaw YSPs is tantamount to destroying an industry completely and destroying millions of jobs. And of course, the clueless writers are not even aware that there were some shennigans going on with YSPs after all. Banks (not brokers) would offer triple the commission for risky negam loans pushing brokers in that direction. YSP manipulation by banks is a problem; YSPs themselves are not. I am tired of mortgage brokers taking the blame the global financial collapse. There is plenty of blame to go around.

  • Bruce 08/18/2008 8:18:00 PM

    All you need to do is look at the publicized efforts beginning with Bank of America to provide loans and other scoures of credit to ILLEGAL ALIENS! There couldn't be a higher risk group in the country and yet banks were falling over themselves to provide credit. I never understood why the banks were exposing themselves to such risk but this article has helped to bring things into perspective. There is plenty of blame to go around for the mortgage crisis but perhaps under Coumo UHD was the genesis. There was no mention in the article but i wonder if the HUD regulations that increased the level of risk for the GSEs also required increased holdings to back the loans.

  • Stop 08/13/2008 12:07:00 AM

    Thank you for the well written article. Most of all: thank you for the truth--as disgusting as it may be. Thus, as taxpayers and diminishing USA workforce with excessive taxation due to greed, unconscionable inability to stop corrupt officials and incompetent government and business: we the people are at the mercy of Russia and the middle east for oil; Communist China for junk and trade deficity while being poisoned... I do note: the period in which hispanics and blacks were complaining about red lining or not being able to purchase. Now we whom are left struggling even more have to take up the tax to deficit to bankruptcy burden and carry even more: but the worst is against those not even born for the choices are being made for them by EVIL. Is the NO JUSTICE for WHITE COLLAR CRIME? Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You One Nation Under GOD Bless Those who live under the TEN COMMANDMENTS

  • GOD 08/12/2008 8:21:00 AM

    THE AMERICAN PEOPLE! SHOULD ALL ,GET TO TOGETER,AND HANG THOSE! RAT COCK SUCKERS!I,HAVE A FEELING IT WON'NT BE LONG! THE POLITICAL POLITICS DESTROY AMERICA! ITS JUST A,MATTER OF TIME! LIKE THE FRENCH DID IN THE 18 TH,CENT, THIS IS WHAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE MUST DO TO ALL OF THESE LOW LIVES !THESE COCK SUCKERS!! WHERES ANDREW CANNAIN WHEN WE NEED!!HE REALLY IS THE GOOD GUY! THE POWERFUL AND THE RICH USE HIM AND LAUGH AT HIM!! I WAS SO HAPPY WHEN I,HEARD ANDREW JUST BLOWN THE FUCKEN !! HEADS OFF!

  • Tom 08/11/2008 7:04:00 AM

    If banks were actually required to hold at least some of their mortgages instead of selling them in the secondary market, lending might become a more honest enterprise. Some of us are old enough to remember buying our first homes when mortgage rates were double digits and 20 percent down payments were the norm.

  • William Sieers 08/10/2008 8:41:00 AM

    LITTLE PINK SUBPRIME HOUSES (to the melody of Pink Houses by John Cougar Mellencamp) Theres a black man with a black cat Living in a redline neighbourhood Hes got an interstate runnin through his front yard You know, he thinks, negative equities good And theres a woman in the kitchen cleanin up the evening slop And he looks at her and says: hey darling, I think this interest rates over the top! Chorus: Oh but aint that america for you and me Aint that america were somethin to see baby Aint that america, home of the subprime disease Little pink houses for you and me Well theres a young man in a t-shirt Listening to Greedspan shoot the breeze Hes got a greasy hair, greasy smile He says: lord, Lehman must be my destination cuz they told me, when I was younger Boy, youre gonna work in a wall street bank But just like CDOs, those crazy old dreams Just kinda came and went Chorus: Oh but aint that america for you and me Aint that america were something to see baby Aint that america, home of the SEC Little pink houses for you and me Well theres bankers and more brokers What do they know know know Go to work in some high rise And vacation out at the Hamptons, oh no! Ohhh yeah And theres winners, and theres losers But they aint no big deal cuz the simple man baby pays for the thrills, The pills and the bills that kill Chorus: Oh but aint that america for you and me Aint that america were somethin to see baby Aint that america, home of the riskless real estate dream Little pink houses for you and me Oh but aint that america for you and me Aint that america were somethin to see baby Aint that america, home of investment banker greed Little pink houses for you and me

  • Paul Jorion 08/10/2008 7:07:00 AM

    Six people involved in writing such an uninformed piece? Beats me! The information on what really happened is not lacking though: extensive reports from the GSEs' supervisor: the OFHEO (not mentioned even once in the article), GAO, endless Congress and Senate Committee's hearings over the years, Fed research teams' analyses, Alan Greenspan's own speeches on the subject, you name it! What we're offered instead as information sources are� other reporters' derivative pieces! Pretty embarrassing.

  • Matthew 08/09/2008 7:41:00 PM

    So many proggy writers have rushed to provide their take on the how and why of the "crisis" and all end up being just an exercise in personal pointing of fingers that usually reside in various other orifices, but I just keep reading them. This is much more of the same, a barrage of names and acronyms and dubious attempts to make connections out of context. The meta-structure of this writing suggests the complex nature of a highly politicized backstory to the "crisis", but also the old fox-hen house paradigm, when farmer Fed exclaims "Where did all these feathers come from???" Millions have been fatally plucked but now the rest of the coop has to help save the fox.

  • dave 08/09/2008 4:18:00 PM

    Yeah this is all Andrew Cuomo's fault. What a piece of trash article this is. This has to be one of the dumbest articles I have ever read. I had no idea the subprime crisis started because Cuomo want to increase minority home ownership---what? I am no Cuomo fan, but I can call a spade a spade, and this article is seriously misplaced.

  • dave 08/09/2008 4:18:00 PM

    Yeah this ia all Andrew Cuomo's fault. What a piece of trash article this is. This has to be one of the dumbest articles I have ever read. I had no idea the subprime crisis started because Cuomo want to increase minority home ownership---what? I am no Cuomo fan, but I can call a spade a spade, and this article is seriously misplaced.

  • pork 08/09/2008 2:33:00 AM

    pray this is the beginning of the end of this fool's higher office ambition.

  • pork 08/09/2008 2:32:00 AM

    pray this is the beginning of the end of this fool's higher office ambition.

  • pork 08/09/2008 2:32:00 AM

    pray this is the beginning of the end of this fool's higher office ambition.

  • pork 08/09/2008 2:31:00 AM

    pray this is the beginning of the end of this fool's higher office ambition.

  • Seth Feldon 08/09/2008 12:11:00 AM

    Good way of showing a piece of the big picture. Andrew Cuomo is known in my circle as a deceptive operator proud of his tough bullying tactics. This piece also shines a little light on parts of his character.

  • Carola Von Hoffmannstahl-Solom 08/08/2008 6:57:00 PM

    Terrific work uncovering a missing piece of the mortgage meltdown puzzle.

  • Derwin Nevada 08/07/2008 6:48:00 AM

    This has to be the stupidest piece ever written by Mr. Barrett. There are numerous books out today that detail how our nation got into this mortgage mess and not one makes the assertion he makes in this article. Maybe Wayne should have taken some time to read Chain of Blame by Paul Muolo and Mathew Padilla, Confessions of a Subprime Lender by Richard Bitner, The New Paradigm for Financial Markets by George Soros or Bad Money by Kevin Phillips - all of whom have a lot more knowledge about this issue then Wayne! The only thing I agree with is his point that politicans played a role in it from Clinton days through Bush days. This includes HUD officials, White House, Members of Congress, Governors and Mayors all of whom jumped on the homeownership bandwagon since it was driving our economy to new heights and keeping us out of the recession and depression! For Barrett to now put the blame on Cuomo for the 4 years he was HUD secreatry is just outrageous. More outrageous of him is to imply that an association representing the mortgage industry (which if you read the latest press on that group is about to be bankrupt and go kaput) was under his "control" because several HUD employees ended up with jobs there - WOW! - Has he not heard of the revolving door in DC. Is it such a shocker to find out that folks who have housing and mortgage finance experience would go to the private sector after government service to find employment given the world as it exists in DC - is simply stupid and naive and hard to believe that such an experienced reporter as Barrett would assert. Sounds more like Barrett has an axe to grind with Cuomo. Maybe he is jealous that Cuomo is the AG and actually doing stuff now to help folks affected by the mortgage crisis. To also infer that Cuomo is doing nothing now is mind boggling. Maybe he is not pursuing a case against Countrywide as other AGs are because NY already brought a case against them 2 years ago under now disgraced Gov and former AG Spitzer. One of his last acts as AG was to sign a multimillion dollar settlement with Countrywide. Wayne --so some research before you sprout off with vindictive about Mr. Cuomo. He implies that he spoke to their Annual Convention as HUD Secretary - DUH...every HUD Secretary speaks to the Group if you look back at their Annual meetings agendas...so it was nothing special for Cuomo to speak there. And what does Mario speaking there have to do with any of this...he is on the speaker circuit...this year if you look at their website they got Karl Rove and John Edwards being paid to speak... Wayne should also look at the facts from Open Secrets.com - the Mortgage Bankers never gave a dime to Mr. Cuomo. In fact if you look at who the Mortgage Bankers gave money to you will see even with all these Cuomo folks employed - they gave more money to Republicans then Democrats - hundreds of thousands more...Here is the record: 1998 Cycle 31% to Democrats, 69% to Republicans 2000 Cycle 29% to Democrats, 71% to Republicans 2002 Cycle 40% to Democrats, 60% to Republicans 2004 Cycle 40% to Democrats, 60% to Republicans 2006 Cycle 41% to Democrats, 58% to Republicans 2008 Cycle to date - 54% to Democrats, 46% to Republicans So as you would see Wayne...not a very democratic leaning group until this year when D's control both houses.... So in my estimation - this is load of crap from Barrett. Lay off Andrew Cuomo and let him continue to do his job helping New Yorkers...protecting them from harm and trying to save their homes!!!

 

Most Popular Stories


Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy