Top

news

Stories

 

Guantanamo's Final Days

The infamous Prison Camp ain't dead yet

Soldier Morris
Courtesy Layne Morris
Soldier Morris
The hastily built rooms at Camp X-Ray
Barry Blend
The hastily built rooms at Camp X-Ray

The soldiers move through the wheat field, scanning the windswept plain for signs of trouble. There are six of them, dressed in fatigues and body armor, wearing the sunglasses and bushy beards popular among the Special Forces. The only thing they can hear is the rustling of wheat stalks.

They are a few miles outside Ab Khail, a small Afghan hill town near the Pakistani border, deep in Taliban territory. It's a primitive village, a place of crumbling brick hovels, mud-walled huts, and open sewers lining the streets. This is one of the first battlefields in America's War on Terror.

Today, the soldiers are looking for an Al-Qaeda explosives maker and Taliban sympathizers. Following GPS coordinates, they leave the field and cross a dirt road before arriving at a crude fort surrounded by mud walls. Inside, a group of bearded men is huddled in the shadows, clutching Kalashnikov rifles.

Those clearly aren't Afghan farmers, thinks Staff Sgt. Layne Morris, a 40-year-old veteran soldier from Salt Lake City and one of the unit's leaders.

Suddenly, shots come from a hole in the compound wall. The soldiers duck. Explosions rock the ground. Morris finds shelter behind a grain silo. After a few moments, he rises to launch a grenade from the M-4 strapped around his neck. The moment he pulls the trigger, something hot and hard slaps him in the eye. He hears a crunching sound in his head as white-hot pain spreads across his face. For a moment, he wonders if he is dead.

A piece of shrapnel has hit him in the nose, sliced into his skull, and severed an optic nerve. He crawls in the dirt, searching for his rifle, until medics pull him behind the silo to stanch the blood gushing from his face. The fighting rages for almost an hour.

When the gunfire finally stops, the soldiers charge into the compound. They find two Al-Qaeda fighters under the rubble, their bodies badly burned and cloaked in dust. One has two gunshot wounds in his chest; he wears a pistol in a holster, and an AK-47 lies by his side.

Then a moaning sound comes from the back of the compound. The dust stirs, obscuring a child-size body. One of the Americans fires two rounds into the figure.

When the soldiers approach, they can see this is no hardened Al-Qaeda foot soldier. No more than a boy, he is covered in soot and bleeding from shrapnel lodged in his chest. Two bullets have pierced his back.

After two American medics work to revive him, he moves his arms and legs and then looks up. "Kill me," he whispers in English. "Please kill me."

The soldiers refuse.

Today, more than six years later, the skinny 15-year-old who lay dying in the dust has become one of the most famous and controversial figures in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. His name is Omar Khadr, and he is the only Westerner held at the prison camp just across the Florida Straits from Miami.

Now age 22, he is also its youngest detainee, accused of throwing the grenades that wounded Morris and killed Army medic Christopher Speer in that 2002 firefight. Though his trial at the camp was recently suspended, he stands to become the first child soldier tried by the United States. After years of torture and isolation, he is both a symbol of America's many mistakes in the War on Terror and a breathing example of the reason for the camp's existence.

Cases like the child soldier's represent perhaps President Barack Obama's most difficult challenge: what to do with the men—now further radicalized by torture—who would almost certainly threaten Americans everywhere if released.

The danger may be real. Just a few weeks ago, Saudi Arabian officials acknowledged that 11 men released from Guantánamo are now on the kingdom's most wanted list because of alleged Al-Qaeda connections. And this past December, the Pentagon reported that 61 former detainees have re-engaged in terrorist activities.

"We can't just let them go, and if we do, there's going to be blood on somebody's hands when they turn around and attack us again," says Morris, who lost his right eye in the firefight with Khadr. "Most of them down there are hardcore admitted terrorists. Their loyalty is to a cause, and for that simple fact alone, they are a threat to Western society."


Omar Khadr's life and lineage epitomize that of a radical Muslim terrorist. He was born in Toronto in 1986, the fourth of seven children. In his first few years, the family lived with his mother's parents in Scarborough, a dreary working-class suburb of Toronto defined by strip malls crammed with halal butcher shops and Pakistani travel agencies. His father, Ahmed—a broad-faced man with a heavy brow, thick neck, and long, scraggly beard—told his children he didn't want to die an old man in bed. "If you love me," he said, "pray that I get martyred."

When Omar was just a toddler, his father quit his job as an engineer and moved the family to Peshawar, Pakistan, to join thousands of other radical Muslims, including Osama bin Laden, in the battle against the Soviets. Once there, Ahmed took charge of a Canadian charity that allegedly funneled money to Al-Qaeda. He also ran schools for children who were reportedly taught a radical version of Islam.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next Page >>
 
  • Marnie Tunay 05/27/2009 8:17:00 AM

    It's not true that Dennis Edney wants Omar Khadr to move in with him. In fact he said the opposite when I had coffee with him in early November, 2009. Marnie Tunay Fakirs Canada http://fakirscanada.spaces.live.com/default.aspx

  • Maureen Santora 03/18/2009 7:22:00 AM

    When a person young or otherwise decides to purposely harm another human being, he should be made accountable for his actions. We have forgotten the almost 3,000 individuals who died on September 11, 2001. We have forgotten the soldiers who have died and the ones who are injured like soldier Morris. Why have the terrorists and the detainees who were arrested because of war crimes now the victims? The soldiers at Guantanamo are professional and doing a job that most of us could not do. My husband and I were privleged to meet them personally when we went to the trials in late November 2008. These terrorists are proud to have harmed America. They have no intention to change their views and be "assimilated" into western society. If given the opportunity they have vowed to strike again. What is wrong with the public and the press that their intentions are not clearly understood. They will not rest until we are defeated. We must make every attempt to protect ourselves. If that means incarcaration for the many detainees than so be it. We must stop feeling sorry for these individuals who are proud and happy that they have killed our citizens.

  • Mike 03/07/2009 7:37:00 PM

    Guantanamo was a terrible mistake. Locking people up indefinitely without a fair and speedy trial is the ultimate un-American activity. It is a cop-out to use the fear card and say that we'll lock them up "just in case". I am in the military and spent time in Afghanistan and sympathize with the difficulty of telling the good guys from the bad guys. Cops face this dilemma everyday. That is why we have a separate judiciary to weight the evidence against an individual in a setting where both the prosecution and the defense have access to both the individual and the evidence. Locking people up based on classified information is a huge no-no. That person can never receive a fair trial. There are no easy answers or perfect solutions in real life. Guantanamo was too easy and we will be paying the price for this travesty of justice for years to come. It only gives the radical recruiters more talking points.

  • Joanne Pacicca 03/01/2009 1:36:00 AM

    Jeff you are certainly right...and logical! Great post!

  • Jeffrey Saxton 03/01/2009 12:11:00 AM

    Sorry for the typo...Thanks Tim Elfrink!

  • Jeff Saxton 02/28/2009 11:48:00 PM

    Joanne, Stan's statements can't be "traitorist" because he's Canadian and ridiculing Canada doesn't solve anything. Gitmo's use to warehouse and torture "prisoners of war" was wrong, but the wholesale release of these threats isn't right either. One possible solution is to take the Taliban up on their desire for a truce, as long as they do not harbor or provide support for al-Qaeda. Relying on rehabilitation alone will be difficult, since after undergoing torture the prisoners would naturally be more radicalized. The irony of this "War on Terrorism" is how we have unwittingly helped the recruitment of thousands of willing volunteers into al-Qaeda and radical Islam by shrub's agression into Iraq. And for every innocent civilian killed by our troops in Afganistan or by a Hellfire missle launched by a Predator into Pakistan, we play into our enemy's hand, helping to provide willing foot-soldiers in their fight against our troops and the US and it's allies in general (which President Obama has embraced, considering the present frequency of these illogical and illegal attacks into Pakistan). The ultimate irony is that killing bin-Laden and/or his lieutenants will not help stop the killing of Americans. Since al-Qaeda is divided into autonomous cells, killing him will simply turn bin-Laden into a martyr. Not to say he shouldn't be brought to justice, but our efforts to eradicate al-Qaeda should be applied like a surgeon's skill world-wide and not be viewed with the tunnel vision view that killing bin-Laden is going to end the threat to our country. I don't have an answer on what we should do with Kadr and other's of his ilk, but simply letting them go is not the answer. I would like to thank Tim Elfink and Jesse Hyde for a fair and balanced bit of reporting and the Village Voice for publishing it.

  • Joanne Pacicca 02/27/2009 5:48:00 AM

    Of course, the mistakes of the past must be corrected with solutions that protect our military and citizenship. The issue of Guantanamo is a shame...for those that constructed and supported it. However, I do not agree with the traitorist comments above. There must be rules and the Geneva Convention should be evoked by the USA. By the way, Canada is "America Light".

  • stan squires 02/25/2009 9:30:00 PM

    I wanted to say that Omar Khadr shouldn't have been in Guantanamo to begin with.He should be here in canada.Those people who are slandering him should be behind bars.The real terrorists are the american gov.who supported the taliban in the 1980s and gave them arms and anything else they wanted.The canadian gov. is no better for having troops in Afghanstan.Omar Khadr is an innocent person and there is lots of evidence to back that up.There is no one at Guantanamo that can get a fair trial.The quicker that place is closed down the better. Stan squires

 

Most Popular Stories


Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy