Top

news

Stories

 

My Brother the Slumlord

Going public is something Amy Neustein never could resist

In early November, Amy Neustein called the Voice with a message about her brother, an Orthodox Jew who owns a number of buildings in Inwood and Washington Heights.

"My brother," she said, "is a slumlord."

Neustein said she was overcome with worry: The tenants in her brother's building were living with rodents, lead paint, and no heat or hot water. The situation there had become so dire, she explained, that local politicians had declared their support for the tenants, who are largely Spanish-speaking, and her brother, Joshua Neustein, had become a notorious figure in the local Spanish-language press.

Neustein also explained that she has long disliked her brother; a few years ago, she changed her last name so that it would be pronounced Neu-stine instead of Neu-steen to distance herself from him. Vouching for her credibility, Neustein also pointed out that she's an author and an activist—at 51, she's a veteran of many crusades.

She first came to prominence some 20 years ago over a lengthy custody battle for her young daughter, who she claimed had been sexually abused by her ex-husband. After the court disagreed and awarded the father custody, Neustein became a public figure and a symbol for other women who felt they were harmed by the family court system. She went on to co-write From Madness to Mutiny: Why Mothers Are Running From the Family Courts—and What Can Be Done About It, which was published in 2005 by the Northeastern University Press, and is now editing Tempest in the Temple: Jewish Communities and Child Sex Scandals, due out in March by Brandeis University Press.

Despite the time that has passed since her custody case was in court, Neustein's experience is still cited by women's groups as a prime example of bias against women in the family courts. One of her biggest supporters was Governor David Paterson, then a state senator, who became known as an advocate for women and held several hearings on Neustein's behalf. Neustein has built a career in part on talking about her experiences and advocating for other cases involving women fighting for custody of their children after accusations of child sex abuse.

"My schedule is crazy," Neustein wrote in an e-mail, explaining that she was in the final stages of editing Tempest. But she wanted to talk about her brother.

She said she had compelling information about what Josh Neustein was putting his tenants through. And, yes, she acknowledged that it was unusual for a sister to accuse her own brother of something so damaging—and especially to do so by going to the press.

But Amy Neustein has long had a complicated relationship with the media. That became plain as we learned about her brother's buildings—and plenty more about Amy Neustein herself.


The part about her brother wasn't hard to check out. Josh Neustein is a notorious landlord, particularly among working-class Dominicans.

In May, the Spanish-language newspaper El Diario published a front-page story titled "Hispano Contra Goliat" ("Hispanic Versus Goliath"), reporting that a contractor said he was owed thousands of dollars and six years of back pay by Neustein. Another news story referred to a lawsuit filed by tenants, which pointed out that the city had been forced to make 11 emergency repairs to 78 Post Avenue, a Section 8 building owned by Neustein, over the past two and a half years.

When we arrived at 78 Post Avenue in early November, the locks on the doors were broken, so that any visitor could stroll in (at the time, Neustein was under court order to replace the doors).

Manuela Ceballos, 44, has lived in the building for 20 years, calls everyone mi amor, and speaks with a thick Dominican accent. She works for the Board of Education, where she spends her days fielding parental complaints.

Ceballos swung open the door to her first-floor apartment, where she lives with her three teenage children. The apartment was a small oasis in the grim surroundings: Full curtains hung over the windows, hiding metal bars; in the living room, plush armchairs surrounded a large flat-screen TV. Ceballos's daughter, Perla, was filling out boarding-school applications in the bedroom she shares with two teenage brothers. Perla wants to go to boarding school because she's sick of the sound of gunshots in the courtyard behind her window.

"This place is clean because I live here," Ceballos said, explaining that she'd replaced every tile, light fixture, cabinet, and sink by hand when she moved from an upstairs apartment a few years ago. "Before, there were drug dealers here."

Tenants at 78 Post Avenue describe the security of the building as precarious and say the maintenance is terrible. Many say that as recently as a few months ago, drug dealers would come from the Bronx to conduct business in the building—and when the courtyard got too cold, they simply moved in to the central lobby. In some apartments, pipes and bathroom walls are leaking water. A couple of days a month, tenants resort to taking showers with water boiled on the kitchen stove. A year before, tenants got together and painted the faded façade of the building at their own expense.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next Page >>
 
  • jm 01/31/2009 5:22:00 AM

    I don't understand the harsh criticism of Amy Neustein in the comments. Regardless of who draws attention to the horrid conditions in buildings owned by Joshua Neustein, there is absolutely no excuse for allowing his properties to become unlivable and for taking the money given to him by his tenants and not using it to make the dwellings safe and livable. The city should fine Josh Neustein heavily and force him to repair his properties or be jailed. How can you criticize an individual who speaks out in support of tenants whose rights have been ignored? That this person is the landlord's sister is not nearly as important as the fact that the health and safety of her brother's tenants is at risk.

  • Ronin 01/17/2009 12:05:00 AM

    After reading a published letter criticizing the article My Brother the Slumlord article I was compelled to write this letter. As a tenant activist (I publish the Rentwars.com website and cable TV show) I completely disagree with the idea that this article somehow hurt the tenants. It gave voice to the tenant complaints at issue which the very court set up to do so fails to do. The article even mentions tenants winning large sums of money against this landlord for negligence and for lead paint. These to things alone are odd in the sinister world of slumlords. The average slumlord has the building in a sham corporate name and whenever sued they shift ownership to another sham corporation. The average slumlord pays off the HPD to skip emergency repairs. Dwoskin even went so far as to quote the landlord saying the building isn't newsworthy. This is a building where a senior can pour hot water on drug dealers and brag about and it is definitely not the worst building in New York City. In many areas seniors are afraid to even complain about drug dealers for fear of retaliation. When reading this I wondered why the Voice was doing an article on a Slumlord Lite, who even keeps Section 8 tenants in a city where even slumlords evict and bar Section 8 tenants in search of more lucrative tenants. The answer is just because of who this Slumlord Lite's sister is... And boy, what a story this became. I expected something dogmatic and Politically Correct. Instead, like layers of an onion it revealed itself as a serious work off journalism that took real bravery to present. Instead of just allowing Amy Neustein to use her "celebrity" to use the Voice as a vehicle to harass her (non-angelic, Slumlord Lite) brother, Dwoskin dug deeper into the very reason Neustein is a celebrity and uncovered Sherry Orbach's voice to those who would otherwise continue to swallow Neustein's fraud. The article even discussed Orbach's shunning by those you would expect to embrace her, a child abused by her parent (in this case her media pimping mother). The court system comes out looking pretty good in this case. It really didn't allow Neuman's lies to mislead it. But rest assured that had Orbach's father been a low-income minority the results would have been very different. There are many stories of fathers being railroaded by the system. Dwoskin must be commended on her investigation, and her editors on their spines. For this article to be printed in the Village Voice is amazing and courageous. Keep up the good work!

  • ab 01/14/2009 5:47:00 AM

    This is a great story that weaves a storyline behind a woman's willingness to go the press. The custody battle was particularly interesting. Women who are abused do lose custody of their children to their abusers, but because not all moms who claim abuse are telling the truth, oftentimes those who are abused are not believed. These moms are very vocal in trying to get those custody battles noticed to protect their children. If the story about the daughter's abuse is not true, it is a blow to the moms who lost children to abusers and are not believed by the court. Either way, a fascinating profile of this woman, as evidenced by the strong reaction in comments.

  • Ben R 01/12/2009 8:26:00 PM

    Wow, what a great read. People just don't seem to get the wide berth of subject matter here, that's why they complain about the writing quality. They are used to your typical newsstory which laser focuses on one subject matter, and stays there. This story, it seems all over the place. But I get the story's structure, and its a good and subtle one. It looks like a story about a slumlord so bad his sister has moved to seek publicity against him. But what is revealed is that the sister's act of publicity seeking is the real story. The issue of the slumlord brother is merely a segue into a meatier and more gripping and chilling story. And in order to gain the cooperation of this woman, the reporter has to pose the story structure in such a way. And boy does this woman have serious issues. Namely, she consumes her family relationships, with her daughter, with her brother, in order to gain fame. A real monster. But a lot of people reading the story only see dissonance between subject matters. When the dissonance itself is the only possible gateway to the much more important story. Additionally, I think some people have a hard time getting over how the story is set up initially to enforce their prejudicial surface-level opinions about slumlords and child abusers. And then the story completely demolishes your stereotypical understanding of child abusers, and also completely ignores the issue of slumlords. So, for the typical reader, to find one's expected superficial story about slumlords to be completely ignored (in order to get to the real story), and another typical arrangement: mother fighting her child abusing ex-husband, to be completely reversed... this is disorienting. Rather, for me at least, the story becomes all the more gripping and exhilerating for the dramatic changes in expected outcome. Not that the woman's brother isn't a slumlord, but her ex-husband doesn't seem to be a child abuser. Perversely, this woman is the real child abuser. And worse, she has been ensconced as a crusader against child abuse. A complete phony, and very damaging to a good cause. Let's put it this way: rape is a real problem, a real issue. But every time a woman falsely cries rape, they cast a pall of doubt over real rape victims. In such a way, for purely selfish reasons, they destroy public goodwill, legal progress, and a whole host of other genuine hard won, hard fought, hard work efforts in this world to fight rape. They in many ways do more damage to rape victims than the rapists themselves. Likewise, this monstrous woman destroys valid efforts to fight child abuse for purely selfish attention seeking. Any organization or individual who supports this woman should burn any bridges they have with her. This woman, through her actions, has done horrible damage to the valid fight against child abuse in this world, because she has consumed good will and cast doubt over real world child abuse cases by revealing that some people will actually inculcate themselves into the issue of child abuse simply to harvest sympathy and empathy for their own personal gain. There is an esoteric psychological condition known as Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy. This woman obviously suffers a horribly mutated form of it. Straight up Munchausen Syndrome sufferers will hurt themselves in order to seek medical attention, in order to get affection and love. Meanwhile, Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy occurs when the deranged individual will damage someone else, usually a loved one, usually a parent hurting a child, such as purposely poisoning or hurt their children and masking it as cancer or an accident, for the goal of getting affection and attention for themselves. In such a way we see that this woman herself is the most monstrous form of child abusers, and what's much, much worse, has been ironically and horribly championed as a fighter against child abuse. Its worse because of the pall of doubt this woman casts over the seeking of justice, by showing that some purported protectors of victims are actually the worse kind of villains. I would say that this woman was horribly abused herself growing up, and revisited the crime upon her daughter, a sad state which is common in the subject matter of child abuse. Kudos to the author of this Village Voice peace. What a scoop.

  • ks 01/12/2009 6:10:00 AM

    I think this is a great article!! The reporter did a great job of interweaving all of the many pieces of this complicated story to make sure all sides were covered. Nice work!

  • Laura Weinrib 01/11/2009 7:47:00 AM

    It is a shame that this is the forum in which Amy Neustein's allegations about her daughter's purported abuse have finally been exposed to scrutiny. The plight of the residents at 78 Post Avenue and other low-income apartment buildings, while worthy of public attention, is an unfortunate distraction from what is a deeply troubling issue in its own right: the adherence by the mainstream media, without fact-checking or independent verification, to a sensationalist story that the judicial system has thoroughly discredited. I know Sherry Orbach well. She is a brilliant, vibrant woman who has dedicated her life to advancing social justice. She is thoughtful, generous, and sincere in her personal life as well as her professional one. Her commitment, integrity and even temperament have earned her the esteem of her mentors and colleagues. The failure of reputable organizations to take her (well-documented) complaints seriously is baffling. It is tragic that in her childhood Orbach was subjected to public humiliation by an overly credulous, if well-meaning, media. It is indefensible that her efforts as an adult to dissuade news outlets, university presses, and institutions from crediting her mother's accusations (and, indeed, from honoring her for them), because Orbach chose to act discreetly, have been summarily disregarded. I hope that this article finally gives them pause.

  • RGSOUNDF 01/10/2009 10:42:00 PM

    I tend to agree with the other comments. Based on the portrayal of AN in the article, we are facing - sadly enough - a way too familiar personality, horrible, hysterical, lying, exploiting, venomous, and utterly unpleasant. Her fabricated child-abuse story, her "tenant-rights movement" activism, her relations with her brother - slumlord or not - all point out in the same direction: unfortunately and unequivocally bad person, as Amy is.

  • Rob MacKay 01/10/2009 9:52:00 PM

    The title made me think that this was a story about a prominent woman who was taking on her brother the slumlord. In fact, it was a hook to get me to read a story about her custody battle. What a scam. I believe the daughter. The rest is media manipulation.

  • Concerned reader 01/10/2009 9:31:00 PM

    I found this story appalling. It illustrates how a celebrity hungry individual who has demonstrated an inability to get along with people and a media eager to take this situation and sensationalize it can collude for their own mutual benefit and need for publicity. The media has allowed itself to be manipulated by this individual over and over again at the same time ignoring or discounting this young woman�s attempts to tell her own story. They are doing this at the expense of a young woman who wants to get on with HER life. It is greed at its worst.

  • bruisers 01/10/2009 1:28:00 AM

    Horribly written, fact-check challenged swill. The late, great Julie Lobbia (the Voice's best housing reporter EVER) is rolling over in her grave. WAYNE!!!! ROBBINS!!! Can't you stop crap like this from being published?

  • bruisers 01/10/2009 1:14:00 AM

    it's not whats in the article, it's the article itself. poorly written. Like i said, 10th grade level writing - if that.

  • Peter 01/09/2009 9:30:00 PM

    It is not a stereotype nor anti semetic, it is the facts. All of the worst slum lords in NYC are Orthodox or at least Jewish. Look at the list the post publishes annually, the top 10 worst slum lords, at least 8 will be Jewish. Not bad for 2% of the population. Rather than deny the obvious, why not address it and ask why is it so?

  • Andrew Sydlik 01/09/2009 7:58:00 PM

    I'm not sure why people are reacting so harshly to this. I think it a fine article, and that Amy Neustein's story is just plain damn intriguing. I think it shows how life resists being reduced to just "right" and "wrong" - she may have lied about her daughter's sexual abuse, which is a horrible thing to inflict on a child. Thank you to the VV for giving the daughter her own voice to speak on the matter. But she may be right to side with her slumlord brother's tenants. Who's to say that a person who has done a bad thing, even a horrible thing, can't do good things? Then again - this is what I love - there's no certainty for either of those things. Maybe the daughter was lying. Or maybe the story is more complex than either of them will admit. Maybe she is just trying to give her brother bad publicity out of self-interest. But who are we to proclaim we know the truth without being there? As for recognizing that the family comes from an Orthodox Jewish background, I think that is good in that it shows it's not only Christians or Muslims (more commonly attacked in the media) that have their failings.

  • bruisers 01/09/2009 1:17:00 AM

    This reads like a high school reporter wrote it. Sheesh!

  • Joe 01/09/2009 1:09:00 AM

    A horrible, horrible woman who uses the media and politicians, who use her in turn, to further their anti-male and anti-father agendas. Millions of fathers lose custody of their children simply for being male and there is not a single peep from the media and politicians. Yet this horrible woman who loses custody of her child because she victimized her child and the child's father with heinous accusations gets all the press.

  • Edward 01/08/2009 8:58:00 PM

    Why would anyone legitimize her complaints about her brother after hearing from her own daughter that this woman is a liar and media hound? You play into her hands by advancing her hidden agenda of embarrasing her brother and who knows what else. FOr example, maybe she has a monetary dispute with him and threatens him with bad publicity unless he complies to her wishes. The VV accomodates her by giving her media coverage. Just plain stupid, non interesting reporting. And why do you have to mention her brother is ORthodox or even Jewish? You mean you are corroborating the sterotypical greedy Jew of Shakespeare? Who benefits from that?

  • t 01/08/2009 7:08:00 AM

    So what was this story about? A slum lord, a sister angry at her brother. Or a long ago fought custody battle? One that seems to be based on lies and a perpetrated fraud upon the media and NOW. After reading this I tend to believe the daughter. By devoting so much time to the past, (at least 3 out of 5 pages) the present plight of the Dominican neighborhood at 78 Post Avenue is over shadowed. Even though there is ample evidence that the brother slum lord is an a--, the article paints a picture that his sister has issues. This is sad in that "the present plight of the Dominican neighborhood at 78 Post Avenue is over shadowed.

 

Most Popular Stories


Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy