By Albert Samaha
By Amanda Dingyuan
By Anna Merlan
By Anna Merlan
By Albert Samaha
By Tessa Stuart
By Anna Merlan
By Roy Edroso
On October 28, 2012, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority was staring down the barrel of a rocket launcher. In the last hours before Hurricane Sandy made landfall, the agency steeled itself against the storm as best it could: Workers moved as many subway cars and buses as possible out of harm's way and fortified the stations and equipment they couldn't.
It didn't make much difference. When the storm hit, seawater flooded into low-lying stations in steady, salty cascades. You could have scuba-dived through South Ferry-Whitehall Street, where the subway platform was entirely submerged and the lobby was a scene from Waterworld: a lone escalator ascending from a cloudy green lake.
In December, when the agency finished surveying its corroded, waterlogged system, the MTA estimated it had sustained damage in excess of $4 billion—including $4 million worth of subway cars, $222.5 million in station restoration (much of that set aside for South Ferry-Whitehall Street), and $215 million for track repairs.
Sandy was a blow to the MTA, but what happened next was, arguably, worse. As the agency tallied the damage and submitted its claims, it was becoming painfully clear that, under the current conditions, it would not be able to afford the kind of insurance coverage it had maintained when the storm hit.
Its policy was set to expire May 1.
That's how the fate of the subway system ended up in the hands of just 20 investors. If a hurricane were to descend on New York tomorrow, repairs to the subway system would be paid for with money put up by those investors, who bought shares of a so-called catastrophe bond the MTA sold this past summer.
It's not philanthropy; it's an investment. The same 20 bankrollers stand to make millions, provided another Sandy doesn't hit tomorrow or anytime in the next three years.
Before Sandy, the MTA owned an insurance policy worth $1 billion. After the storm, says the agency's director of risk and insurance management, Laureen Coyne, "It was impossible to get that kind of coverage." Even half a billion dollars' worth would have cost twice as much. The MTA was particularly concerned about its protection in the event of another flood.
"We were in a state of panic for several months," says Nora Ostrovskaya, MTA's senior manager of strategic initiatives. A handful of potential solutions were considered and discarded before one of the agency's consultants floated the idea of a catastrophe bond.
"Normally, when MTA contemplates a project, we have certain control over when we execute. With any of our big capital commitments, we can say, 'OK, let's wait until the architectural plan is fully fleshed out. Let's wait for an approval. Let's wait for this; let's wait for that.'" In this case, Ostrovskaya says, "we were under tremendous time pressure."
Without a lot of options, the MTA dove headfirst into the small, strange catastrophe bond market, where an estimated 100 investors worldwide do $16 billion worth of deals. Other wagers available in the market include whether there will be a windstorm in Europe, an earthquake in Japan, a cyclone in Australia, or major crop losses in Mozambique.
In order to sell the bond, the MTA's in-house insurer, First Mutual Transportation, enlisted a law firm to create an offshore entity dubbed MetroCat Re, located—for "various legal and tax reasons," Coyne says—in Bermuda. All the money involved in the bond arrangement goes through MetroCat Re.
Essentially, the bond is a simple high-stakes bet: If a catastrophic hurricane causes a Sandy-magnitude storm surge on or before August 5, 2016, investors lose every cent they ponied up. No hurricane, and they get all of their money back, plus a return that will top 13.5 percent.
The MTA put the bond up for sale in July, expecting to sell $125 million in shares, but the interest was overwhelming. The agency ultimately sold more than $200 million to just 20 investors. (Ostrovskaya describes the buyers not as individuals, but "pretty much specific catastrophe bond funds that specialize in this type of investment.")
The surge protection supplements the $500 million in insurance the MTA has purchased to cover perils such as wind and fire. That policy costs the MTA $46 million a year.
It's easy to see why the catastrophe bond was popular—it's an incredibly lucrative proposition. A $10 million share could pay off more than $1.35 million in just three years.
The money comes straight from the MTA, which makes quarterly payments into a trust, in much the same way that it would pay an insurance premium. At the end of three years, if disaster hasn't struck, the investors cash out.
The question, of course, is whether disaster will strike.
Long-range hurricane forecasts are notoriously imprecise. James Franklin, branch chief of the hurricane specialist unit at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Hurricane Center, says NOAA's seasonal forecasts are only marginally more accurate than "just predicting 'average' every year." This year, for instance, the agency predicted hurricane activity would be above average, but more than halfway through the season, activity has been well below normal.
If it's hard to forecast hurricanes, trying to predict a storm surge associated with a hurricane adds another order of magnitude to the puzzle. Says Franklin: "We don't even begin to make storm-surge predications until we're within 48 hours of landfall."
NOAA does have a program called HURISK, which models the return paths for storms along the coasts. That, Franklin says, offers some idea of the odds that a Sandy-size storm will return to the city: "For New York City, it's once every 175 years for a major hurricane, and once every 25 years for a hurricane."
Even if New York does see a second superstorm sooner than predicted, the surge would have to hit at a certain angle to flood the subway system.
"A storm that parallels the coast and comes into, say, Long Island from the south-southwest—it would count as a hurricane, but it wouldn't be approaching at the right direction to cause a lot of flooding in the New York subway system," Franklin explains. "Only certain orientations of the hurricane would do that kind of damage."
Put simply, Franklin says, "To get another surge event like that in New York in the next three years is really unlikely."
In other words, investors are likely to make a killing. According to Risk Management Solutions, Inc., the agency the MTA employed to calculate the risk, there's only a 1.67 percent chance of an equivalent storm surge every year.
The odds are firmly in favor of the bettors, to whom the MTA is prepared to shell out $27 million.