By Christian Viveros-Fauné
By Miriam Felton-Dansky
By Tom Sellar
By Tom Sellar
By Jessica Dawson
By Tom Sellar
By R. C. Baker
By Tom Sellar
Before I lock and load, let me state my bias. I'm a card-carrying member of the ACLU and the NRA. I don't want the state in my uterus or my gun collection. Having guns controlled by the government is like having abortion rights regulated by men. As with abortion, the debates over guns in America are underscored by seemingly irreconcilable differences, if not seething hatred: conflicting values based on structural positions of class, race, gender, religion, and region. At the bottom of the gun controversies is a bitter culture war in which pro-gun Second Amendment fanatics see America on the verge of anarchy, requiring law-abiding people to arm themselves in self-defense. Such people no longer believe the police can protect them, or that they live in a democracy. Anti-gun crusaders are cosmopolitans who look to European society as a bastion of peaceful gun-free sanity. These gun-control advocates view America as a violent nation awash in firearms, held hostage to the impulsive acts of unstable people. Living in two different worlds, each side feeds the other's fears.
But guns make America a special place. According to Tom Diaz, a former congressional expert on handgun control, the United States has become "a kind of underdeveloped moral Third World, a place where the rest of the world can indulge its gun lust." Brochures lure tourists to shooting ranges on both coasts, offering "the opportunity to shoot guns strictly controlled everywhere in the world but here." Tourists from countries like Japan with strong anti-gun laws use America as a playgroundthe way Americans take sex tours to Thailand. Underlying all the Second Amendment rights rhetoric, Diaz claims, is a full-metal-jacket capitalist agendain which a gun is a dealer's "little moneymaking machine." As the market became increasingly saturated and stagnant over time, gun makers began producing more powerful, lethal weapons and targeting new consumerswomen, minorities, and youth. In today's gun market, the focus has shifted from skill, accuracy, and marksmanship to speed and firepower. The ultimate purpose of guns is killing, yet they remain unregulated, like sex in Thailand.
Americans have been able to challenge the tobacco industry and to demand quality control on everything from automobiles to hair dryers, but until recently guns remained off- limitsthe result of Second Amendment zealots, gun lobbying, and a cultural history saturated in firearm mythologies. But that's changing. Last February a federal jury found several gun makers liable in seven New York Cityarea shootings, charging them with negligent marketing practicesdumping handguns onto the black market and failing to weed out dishonest distributors. Other cities including New Orleans, Miami, and Chicago have filed similar suits. In recent years we've seen the carnage from Waco to Ruby Ridge, from the Long Island Railroad to a high school in Littleton, Colorado. Gang-related violence has turned inner cities into teenage wastelands.
We need to think through what guns reallymean to us. Two new booksDiaz's Making a Killing: The Business of Guns in America and Guns in America: A Readeroffer divergent perspectives on this complex American fixation. The editors of Guns in America are three academics from varied disciplines seeking a realistic and sane way to regulate our guns. Basing their ideas on the pragmatic notion that Americans will always want guns (and abortions), the authors represented in Guns in America present a wide range of opinions, cultural histories, and policy recommendations exploring the relationship between guns and our national identity. Diaz, on the other hand, is a self-declared recovering gun nut whose solid and compelling analyses of the economics and politics of gun manufacturing, lobbying, and law are badly undermined by tirades apparently calculated to play upon liberal fear. Watch out! Survivalists are stockpiling semiautomatics!! Remember, a gun killed John Lennon!!
Diaz reduces gun shows to a "breeding ground for illegal gun sales." Anyone unfamiliar with gun showsessentially flea markets for hobbyists and collectorswould conclude from Diaz's portrait that America's gun subculture is a euphemism for white power. Diaz never discusses hunters, nor does he consider rural traditions or how the politics of class and region play out in the gun control controversy. He also ignores the legions of retired cops and military men for whom gun collecting is more like bowling than some right-wing conspiracy.
In contrast, Guns in Americapresents a broader and deeper exploration of our relationship to firearms. Forty-three chapters written by journalists, academics, physicians, lawyers, politicians, policy makers, and crusaders give us enough information to make up our own minds. "Our history cannot be told without acknowledging the centrality of guns in our national experience," argue the editors in the introductory chapter. A historical section traces the roots of gun culture among Puritans and the early restrictions placed upon firearmsslaves were prohibited from carrying them, and concealed weapons in cities and saloons were not allowedpointing out that "the guns that liberated some are the same guns that terrorized others." The manifest destiny that empowered European imperialists would have failed had Native peoples (and slaves) been armed. Recognizing that our love of guns is built on myth, David T. Courtwright examines cowboy subculture, providing an illuminating, raunchy portrait. Contrary to our image of handsome, shining heroes of the Great Plains, cowboys "were lower-class bachelor laborers in a risky and unhealthful line of work...members of a disreputable and violent subculture with its own rules for appropriate behavior.