In the ongoing saga of race and American injustice, there are few episodes as horrifying as that of the "Scottsboro boys." Barak Goodman and Daniel Anker's well-researched, rapidly paced (but, at 87 minutes, far too brief) documentary Scottsboro: An American Tragedy offers a compelling outline of the case, the underlying issues (racism, the "Southern rape complex," anti-Semitism, the antagonism between North and South, Communist activism in the 1930s), and the people involved, all of whom were scarred for life, though none so deeply as the Scottsboro boys themselves.

In 1931, nine black men, who ranged in age from 13 to 19, were riding a freight train filled with hobos and people looking for work. As they entered Alabama, the teenagers got into a fight with some white men riding in the same car. No sooner had they been taken off the train by an armed posse than two white women emerged from a boxcar and accused them of gang rape. A crowd gathered, ready for a lynching, but instead the nine men were taken to a prison in the small town of Scottsboro. Within 12 days, they were placed on trial, quickly convicted, and sentenced to death.

Like countless others falsely accused and wrongly convicted, they might have vanished from history, but their cause was taken up by the International Labor Defense, the legal arm of the Communist Party. Committed to organizing blacks in the Depression-devastated South, the CP saw the "legal lynching" of the Scottsboro boys as a rallying point. The case became an international cause célèbre and attracted the attention of a flamboyant New York criminal lawyer, Samuel Leibowitz, who, during the numerous lower-court cases and appeals, was as demonized as his clients. A former Communist activist makes the point in the documentary that Leibowitz was as provincial as most New Yorkers. He didn't anticipate the hatred he would face in the South as an outsider and a Jew to boot.

‘‘Nothing was standing still’’: The defendants in the town square in Scottsboro.
photo: Social Media Productions
‘‘Nothing was standing still’’: The defendants in the town square in Scottsboro.

Details

Scottsboro: An American Tragedy
Directed by Barak Goodman and Daniel Anker
Screening Room
January 19 through 25

Snatch
Written and directed by Guy Ritchie
A Screen Gems release
Opens January 19

Related Stories

More About

In decisions that later would prove crucial to the civil rights movement, the Supreme Court overturned the Alabama courts' decisions not once but twice. The high court's rulings were precedent-setting in terms of due process and equal protection, but it was not until after the third conviction, in 1936, that the Scottsboro Legal Defense Committee struck a deal for a plea bargain: The charges against four of the defendants were dropped while the other five received long prison sentences. In 1943, the state of Alabama began paroling the five imprisoned Scottsboro boys one by one. The last to go free was Hayward Patterson, who had been most vilified during the trials and deemed by the parole board as "sullen, vicious, and incorrigible." He escaped from a chain gang in 1948.

Of his prison experience, Patterson later wrote: "I laid in the top bunk, in a way still feeling I was on a moving freight. Nothing was standing still. I was busy living from minute to minute. Everything was rumbling. I dreamed bad dreams with freight trains, guards' faces, and courtrooms mixed up with the look of the sky at night."

The quote, which we hear as a voice-over toward the end of Scottsboro, provides the filmmakers with expressive motifs: old black-and-white footage of railroad tracks seen from the front of a moving train; a color shot of a train's headlights, as bright as the moon, moving straight toward the camera; the xylophone ostinato in Edward Bilous's mournful score, reminiscent of Philip Glass's score for The Thin Blue Line.

Goodman and Anker adroitly shape a cohesive drama out of a complicated history, so much so that we might not realize until we hear Patterson's words how the film has failed until this point to bring the Scottsboro boys themselves to life. In terms of the film as a whole, Patterson's singularly poetic passage is a case of too little too late, as is the similarly moving final sequence—newsreel footage of a tearful Clarence Norris at a press conference in 1976, just after he had accepted a full pardon from Alabama governor George Wallace. By then, the other Scottsboro boys were dead. Norris, who had spent years in a cell adjacent to the execution chamber and had heard the last words of dozens of condemned men, was the only Scottsboro defendant to have what the filmmakers characterize as a full life after prison.

In their five years of research, Goodman and Anker turned up a treasure trove of material: a half-dozen eyewitnesses, a long-buried archive of courtroom photographs, newsreel footage preserved in the Soviet Union. But the necessity of conforming to the 90-minute format of American Experience, the PBS series that funded Scottsboro, is an illustration of the double bind that serious documentarians face, now that they have nowhere to turn for funding but public and cable television. Without television money, they can't afford to do the research necessary for a film as ambitious as Scottsboro. But the money ties them to TV formulas: Analysis is reduced to sound bites; actors' voice-overs are used to pump up the drama of archival texts. (Frances McDormand's hammy reading of the trial testimony of one of the supposed rape victims, Victoria Price, is especially egregious.) Scottsboro is fine TV, but it suggests that too much material was left behind in the AVID storage file.


For those who care, Madonna has found her match in Guy Ritchie, whose absence of talent when it comes to the film medium is equal to her own. Ritchie's Snatch is a retread of his debut feature, Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels: many of the same actors, same editing overload (which doesn't keep you from noticing that there isn't a single interestingly framed shot in the entire film), same hollowness through and through.

The plot, such as it is, revolves around a stolen diamond as big as the Ritz which passes through the hands of many rival gangsters until it makes its way into the intestines of a ridiculously uncharismatic pit bull. The dog eventually does what dogs do, thus enabling the happy few who are left alive at the final fade to look ahead to a life of luxury. Actually, it's the remaining white gangsters who come out on top while their black brethren get the short end of the stick.

Several cuts above their surroundings are Brad Pitt, as an Irish gypsy and bare-knuckles fighting champion, and Benicio Del Toro in a too brief turn as a hapless thief done in by his gambling jones. Mumbling his dialogue through his nose, Pitt gets maximum comic mileage out of a one-joke role; his dialect is as incomprehensible to everyone else on the screen as it is to the audience.

Snatch is a particularly wearying example of a recent wave of British gangster films, most of which are so pointless that they've made it difficult for such genre gems as Mike Hodges's Croupier and Jonathan Glazer's Sexy Beast (due to open in the States in late spring) to get the audiences they deserve. Sexy Beast has everything Snatch lacks: two complicated central characters brilliantly played by Ray Winstone and Ben Kingsley, a strikingly sensuous visual style, a fab score, and a wonderfully sustained and original heist sequence. Take a pass on Snatch and wait for the real deal.

Show Pages
 
My Voice Nation Help
0 comments
 

Now Showing

Find capsule reviews, showtimes & tickets for all films in town.

Box Office Report

Join My Voice Nation for free stuff, film info & more!

Loading...