Top

film

Stories

 

Once Grand, The Women is Now Just Another Chick Flick

"What do you think this is?" cries a lady who lunches in Diane English's remake of George Cukor's The Women. "Some kind of '30s movie?" Even without the 14-year struggle to get the Murphy Brown writer's pet project past studio doubters, it would be a tall order to remake George Cukor's 1939 hit, let alone try to corral its proudly reactionary gender politics for 21st-century feminism (or what's left of it if Sarah Palin has her way). For one thing, the original movie was made during a period when Hollywood eagerly cranked out women's movies by the dozen, and raked in the profits accordingly. For another, The Women—a product of the creative tension between Cukor, who in his très gay way loved all women provided they came excitable and well-dressed, and his source material, Clare Boothe Luce's viciously clever 1936 stage satire of Manhattan society dames—was pretty out there for a mainstream movie. Luce's play wasn’t just an exhortation to the woman wronged by infidelity to stand by her man and manipulate him back into the nest, but also a furiously conservative attack on the modern woman—a play whose respectably married central character, Mary (played by Norma Shearer), entered with a mannish stride, smoking a pipe. It's only adultery that softens her contours, brings a wistful glisten to her eye at every mention of her husband the heel, and surrounds her with gushy girlfriend gossips who stand ready to rat her out as necessary.

Luce may have been a creep, but she was a fun creep, full of piss and vinegar as she took deadly aim at the useless lives of flighty females with more money than sense. The Women knew what it was, and in Cukor's smooth hands, carried itself with pride and unspeakably fabulous threads. Who knows what English's pudding of a remake thinks it is? Trailing negative buzz and a revolving door of A-list talent since its inception in 1994, The Women isn't so much incompetent—though it has all the visual sumptuousness of a suburban rummage sale—as it is hopelessly tame and muddled. It certainly doesn't help that the movie's lead is completely lacking in the mature glamour that so entranced women filmgoers bracing for a world war, and has had so much plastic correction that her features—all but the ingénue eyes—are immobilized (and this in a movie that sucks whatever laughs it can muster from the Botox-and-surgery subculture). Could that be Meg Ryan peering out from Goldie Hawn's face? Since I have yet to encounter a Ryan comedy in which she fails to flap her hands while pulling on or peeling off woolly socks several fetching sizes too large for her dainty feet, it must be she.

Ryan is all wrong as a contented Connecticut supermom with a half-baked career who's shaken to her core by the news that her husband is having an affair with a Saks “shpritzer girl” (Eva Mendes). Mendes certainly looks the siren part in a black bustier getup from which only the whip is missing, but that’s as close as this warmly sensuous young actress gets to the spitting venom that made Joan Crawford so wickedly funny in the original. Indeed, what makes this version so flaccid is the absence of a bona fide double-talking vixen in the entire coven—and that includes Jada Pinkett Smith, trying way too hard for lesbian hardbody. As for the chief gossip herself, happily single magazine editor Sylvia Fowler: I’ve always pictured Susan Sarandon in the Rosalind Russell part, if only because she seems to have sprung fully formed from the same genetic material as the great (and similarly pop-eyed) actress. Still, Annette Bening is a perfectly fine choice who gets the best line when she sweeps in and says, "This is my face, deal with it," before turning into a dithery ghost of Meryl Streep's caffeinated werewolf in The Devil Wears Prada. Other than, interestingly, the truly older women (Candice Bergen as Mary's mom, Cloris Leachman as a straight-shooting housekeeper, and a woefully underused Bette Midler as a much-married playgirl), that's about as badass as anyone gets among this relentlessly well-intentioned lot.

As it happens, Cukor's screenwriters, Anita Loos and Jane Murfin, also softened the bitter edge of Luce's dialogue enough to allow audiences to identify with Mary's desire to recover her prodigal husband. But they never lost sight of the fact that the play was satire. Turning The Women into a girlfriend-solidarity movie (English has called her remake "a love story between two women") would have made Luce barf, but true to her roots in television, that's what the director has done. It proves fatal.

Before you know it, The Women has shrunk to fit the sewing form of a movie of the week whose heroine is briefly floored by adversity before rising from the ashes, coiffed à la L'Oreal 'cause she's worth it, and fully employed with a little help from her BFFs. Hear her roar—or not. Cripplingly sensitive to its market potential, The Women hedges its bets, leaves its options open, and covers every possible female demographic base before wilting into a gooey maternity-ward finale.

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • Che 09/15/2008 7:18:00 PM

    Yes, Sarah Palin will destroy all women have worked for...by becoming the first female vice president. I guess by the same reasoning if Colin Powell or Clarence Thomas would push black americans back to slavery days by becoming the first African-American President. Unbelievable.

  • Stephen Conn 09/11/2008 10:16:00 PM

    The argument for Palin as bad for the future of feminism is that an Alaska Governor noted for her stand against Exxon's hedgemony on the state is being demoted to window-dressing for women voters in order to get the retrograde policies of an old man into the White House. That ain't feminism-just cynicism.

  • Rebecca Durham 09/11/2008 7:35:00 PM

    I�d like to know what exactly your suggesting would happen to feminism in the 21st century if Sarah Palin had her way. What is �her way� what things specifically do you feel would have a negative affect on women? It�s more than sadly hypocritical for you to not only bash a women like Sarah Palin, a woman who works hard in a male dominated field, a woman who shows us that women don�t have to choose children or careers but can have both, she doesn�t exemplify any of the stereotypical derogatory female misconstructions that women have fought or do fight against. Interestingly enough your comments are the ones that are actually destructive to feminism. You use a small write up about a movie as your forum to make paltry indecorous remarks about people you don�t even know. Excuse the term but when you make sad little bitchy unnecessary comments about other women�s appearances you completely lose your right to criticize another person�s affect on feminism. First of all how about women supporting other women you know being united. Objectification is one of the main issues feminist attempts to deal with. Being valued only for your looks plagues the female community so why would you make mean thoughtless comments about another woman�s body appearing like a lesbians (are you trashing lesbians as well), or make fun of Meg Ryan�s face pulling in another actress for an insulting comparison. I don�t think that a woman should get plastic surgery to change her appearance to please others or in attempt to stay young, however if you truly are concerned about feminism if you care about women do you think the way to help those women and fix that problem is to call them ugly? Furthermore your comments perpetuate the misconception that women are petty, shallow, and fixated on appearance. Why don�t you read a book or maybe shut up and listen for a minute before you subject anyone else to your opinion.

 

Find A Film

for free stuff, film info & more!

Find A Coupon

Popular Coupons

Box Office

  1. Chronicle (2012/ I), 22.0 mil, 22.0 mil
  2. The Woman in Black, 20.9 mil, 20.9 mil
  3. The Grey, 9.3 mil, 34.6 mil
  4. Big Miracle, 7.8 mil, 7.8 mil
  5. Underworld: Awakening, 5.5 mil, 54.2 mil
  6. One for the Money, 5.2 mil, 19.6 mil
  7. Red Tails, 4.7 mil, 41.1 mil
  8. The Descendants, 4.6 mil, 65.5 mil
  9. Man on a Ledge, 4.4 mil, 14.6 mil
  10. Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close, 3.8 mil, 26.7 mil
Movie Title, Weekly Earnings, Total Earnings

Trailers

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy