Buy One Get One
New York, NY 10014
Moon, directed by British advert tyro Duncan Jones, is a modest science fiction film with major aspirations—and even its own genealogical issues. Jones's debut, which had its local premiere at the last Tribeca Film Festival, is pleased to engage genre behemoths—2001, Solaris, Blade Runner—as well as B-movie classics like Invasion of the Body Snatchers.
Moon
Directed by Duncan Jones
Sony Pictures Classics
Opens June 12
Read an interview with Sam Rockwell here.
The tale of a lonely spaceman might have made an excellent Twilight Zone episode, but Moon's premise is particularly suggestive of a song by Jones's father, David Bowie, whose 1969 hit "Space Oddity," took a depressed astronaut as its protagonist. Occupying an even more obscure corner of the cosmos, Sam Bell (a hirsute Sam Rockwell) is introduced running laps on his lunar station treadmill. Like its lone inhabitant, this mining base seems a bit seedy—in fact, it's little more than a slag heap. Bell, alone save for his chaperone Gerty, an ungainly robotic valet with the soothing voice of Kevin Spacey and a smiley face on its TV monitor, has been there for nearly three years and, having almost fulfilled his contract, desperately wants out.
Night is eternal and the sense of isolation palpable. Not only is the base a dump but Gerty is a greatly diminished version of HAL, despite a repertoire of a half-dozen expressions including tearful empathy. Even the tantalizing video messages Bell receives from his wife and daughter back in suburban Connecticut seem designed to exacerbate his alienation. The movie is a virtual solo for Rockwell, whose shambolic everyman is already prone to hallucination and perilously close to a nervous breakdown when he totals his lunar Land Rover while out on a repair mission.
Bell wakes up in the infirmary and, motivated by an obscure urge to investigate, tricks solicitous Gerty into allowing him back outside. Revisiting the scene of the accident, he finds another guy in the crashed vehicle: him. At this point, Rockwell's one-man show turns into a doppelgänger act. Bell's attempts to engage his other, battered self are greeted with sullen animosity. The clone refuses to shake hands—accusing Bell of being a hallucination or worse—although the doubles do eventually play a hostile game of ping-pong and engage in other forms of competitive weirdness, notably a dance set to the manic '80s pop song "Walking on Sunshine." The vaudeville is complicated by intimations of conspiracy, as well as madness.
Referring to the mining company that employs them, one Bell complains that "they haven't even fixed the fucking communication satellite!" That's more or less the problem. Like its protagonist, Moon feels stuck. The situation is naturally oppressive—this is, after all, the story of a man in prison—and the stir-craziness proves contagious. Impressively pulled together on a modest budget, Moon has a strong lead and a valid philosophical premise but, despite Bell's fissured psyche, the drama is inert. Ground control to Major Tom: Moon orbits an idea, but it doesn't go anywhere.
terrible review. And I mean terrible as in sophomoric. inane title, snobby pretensions to high literacy. do you think reviewing movies merely involves recounting the plot with the GRE vocabulary? now i remember why i never bother to read Village Voice's movie reviews. this is pathetic. I've read better reviews in a community college's daily rag.
And also, coming from a second year university student who needs to write papers all the time, "Bowie's Kid Makes Moon, a Space Oddity" is one awful review title! And the comma should be a colon, or a semi-colon, genius! Two thumbs down for bad grammar!
Moon was deeply touching and thought provoking. Spectacular sets, and Sam Rockwell's performance was intense and moving. I can't wait to see what Duncan Jones does next. As far as this review is concerned, I can only say that I strongly disagree. How Hoberman thought that the movie doesn't go anywhere I will never know. But you can either take my word for it, or listen to the guy who doesn't know how to give a review without going through the movie scene by scene.
PLEASE SKIP HOBERMAN'S SPOILER REVIEW I highly recommend this movie as an excellent example of pulling the most psychological meat possible from a bare-bones sci-fi budget and still creating believable future environments. We need more movies like this to balance enjoyable but intellectually empty efforts with bigger special effects budgets. On the other hand, I can hardly suppress my annoyance with Hoberman for irresponsibly giving away a truly major plot point, joining the ranks of hack critics who give you entire plots instead of useful opinion. What's the matter, couldn't he come up with enough words to pad his review?
This movie is a fantastic--and rare--example of hard-core science-fiction, which is about ideas (relationship between man/technology et all). Moon has slow, grinding pace through the middle which J.Hoberman mistakes as an directorial accident--but actually is what is driving the 'valid philosophical premise' that he then lauds. what is pathetic is that this movie has been so underrepresented. a missed opportunity. perhaps Hoberman prefers mindless action flicks?
Is this a joke? No comments, 6 months after the fact? This movie was original and excellent. Not perfect, but ****/5.
Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...
Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...
More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience
Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info
Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips
Log in or Sign up
Social Connect:Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.
Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:
Sign Up or Log in
Social Connect:Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.
Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:
