Top

film

Stories

 

Disney's Princess and the Frog Can't Escape the Ghetto

Six decades after unleashing persistent NAACP bugaboo Song of the South (1946), and two after firmly suppressing it, that peculiar cultural institution known as the Walt Disney Company has made a symbolic reparation by creating its first African-American princess—and plunking her down in the middle of Jim Crow–era Louisiana! A patronizing fantasia of plantation life in post–Civil War Georgia, Song could at least be understood—if hardly excused—as a product of its time (18 years before the passage of the Civil Rights Act). But is Disney's latest, The Princess and the Frog, the Obama-era fairy tale that anyone other than the "birther" crowd has been waiting for?

Froggie went a-courtin'.
Disney Enterprises Inc.
Froggie went a-courtin'.

Details

The Princess and the Frog
Directed by Ron Clements and John Musker
Disney
Opens November 25

Related Content

More About

Just when exactly Princess is supposed to be taking place is never made explicit, save for a brief prologue set in the fall of 1912 (identified by a fleetingly glimpsed newspaper headline announcing the election of segregationist President Woodrow Wilson). It's there that we first meet Tiana, the daughter of a New Orleans seamstress (voiced by Oprah Winfrey) and laborer father (Terrence Howard), as she plays at the very big house of her very white, very blonde, and very rich BFF, Charlotte. The movie then flashes forward to the Jazz Age '20s—but is it before or after the Mississippi River flood of 1927 that burst Louisiana's infamous levees and stranded hundreds of thousands of blacks in refugee camps? Now an enterprising young woman, Tiana (Anika Noni Rose) works double shifts as a waitress, trying to scrape together enough cash to make good on her late father's dream of opening a swanky restaurant. Whatever the year, we are firmly in the grips of "separate but equal"—a reality the movie barely acknowledges.

Like many a storybook maiden before her, Tiana wishes upon a star for a handsome prince to ferry her off to some magic kingdom—or at least help her make a down payment. He then seems to appear in the form of the visiting Prince Naveen of Maldonia (Bruno Campos), a mocha-skinned dreamboat of indeterminate ethnicity (convenient, given the anti-miscegenation laws on the books at the time), who, alas, has his sights set on Charlotte. Before he can say, "I do," however, Naveen finds himself transformed into the titular amphibian by a back-alley voodoo priest (Keith David). And when he subsequently persuades Tiana to kiss him as a way of reversing the spell, instead she turns all ribbity, too.

They say it ain't easy bein' green, but it's certainly a hell of a lot easier than being black. So writer-directors Ron Clements and John Musker (whose 1992 Aladdin proffered a sinister, ear-cutting Middle East) send newly anthropomorphic Tiana and Naveen hopping off into the bayou rather than continuing to dodge ol' Jim Crow on the streets of the Big Easy. There, Princess's rampant a-historicism gives way to a veritable Mardi Gras parade of risible stereotypes: an Acadian firefly with the most exaggerated Cajun dialect this side of celebrity chef Justin Wilson, I gua-ran-tee; a 197-year-old voodoo priestess named Mama Odie; and, lest no Deep South caricature remain unturned, a trio of toothless hillbillies.

Much ballyhooed as Disney's return to its tradition of 2-D "cel" animation after a five-year hiatus, The Princess and the Frog is pleasantly, if unmemorably, drawn. But the movie as a whole never approaches the wit, cleverness, and storytelling brio of the studio's early-1990s animation renaissance (Beauty and the Beast, The Lion King) or pretty much anything by Pixar, which makes it all too easy to follow Mama Odie's own advice and "dig a little deeper."

This hasn't been a banner season for black characters in American movies, from the women lusting after ideals of white beauty in Chris Rock's documentary Good Hair (FYI, Tiana also sports a chemically "relaxed" 'do) to the high school football phenom showered with Sandra Bullock's charity in The Blind Side. Indeed, it says something when, excepting Nelson Mandela in Clint Eastwood's forthcoming Invictus, the closest thing to an assertive, self-confident role model onscreen right now is the obese, illiterate, abused, and HIV-positive "Precious" Jones, who eventually stops fantasizing that someday her prince might come and gets down to the business of getting her GED. But for all its superficial innocuousness—"It's only a kids' movie!" you may already have exclaimed before reading this far—The Princess and the Frog is the most insidious of the lot, precisely because it comes packaged as an all-ages entertainment bearing the imprimatur of the very studio that has branded the imaginations of several generations of the world's children.

Not that Disney is entirely at fault: The PC watchdogs who scrutinized this movie since it was first announced, and who reportedly succeeded at persuading studio bigwigs to change the title (originally The Frog Princess), the name of the protagonist (originally Maddy, feared to sound too much like "Mammy"), and her profession (originally a maid), seem to have entirely missed the forest for the trees—namely, that Disney's first black "princess" lives in a world where the ceiling on black ambition is firmly set at the service industries, and Tiana and her neighbors seem downright zip-a-dee-doo-dah happy about that. "Rich people, poor people, they all got dreams/And dreams do come true in New Orleans" goes one lyric from the film's boisterous opening number, a far cry from Newman's own "Louisiana 1927"—the unofficial anthem of Hurricane Katrina—with its prescient lament, "They're tryin' to wash us away."

 
  • Destinie Collins 12/27/2011 3:06:00 AM

    Thank you.

  • Perez135 11/23/2011 7:41:00 AM

    Mulan was not a princess, she never got married, and if she married Shang, she would not be a princess. And eventually she chooses to go home instead of acquiring a high ranking job. But it's ok, a man wanted her in the end.

  • Asimms03 10/28/2011 12:56:00 AM

    I have to agree with Oreostar's comment about Mulan. I think she was the best princess. Althought all of the Disney princesses were strong and independent women, I liked Mulan the best because she proved that a princess can rescue herself. I would like to see a Latina princess too. Waiting on that one Disney.

  • Asimms03 10/28/2011 12:50:00 AM

    As someone who lives in the suburbs of New Orleans, I can honestly say that the accents were exaggerated, but not as bad as I have heard in other movies where the accents were terrible. I thought the movie was cute and funny, but I did not like the typical voodoo stereotype of the city of New Orleans that seems to be in every movie about the city. I'm surprised it wasn't Mardi Gras throughout the entire movie (another stereotype). When I first learned about this movie I was excited, but then disappointed to learn that the story was not taking place in Africa. Mulan was in Asia, Princess Jasmine was in the Middle East. Why was Tiana in New Orleans during a time when "separate but equal" was law? I thought she would be an African princess from some ancient tribe like Zulu or some other historical tribe. There are modern princesses in Africa today that Disney could have used as models for the character of Tiana and there is also a teenage African prince that could have been a model for the character Naveen.

  • Destinie Collins 06/05/2011 3:25:00 PM

    Ummmm okay. Where do I begin? So, for one, if you lived in New Orleans (as I do) you wouldn't find the accents exgaggerated. Disney ACTUALLY got the accents right. Most movies do not. The only accent they got wrong was Big Daddy's. Media depicts us as either having Southern accents or Cajun accents. Most us us have something of a Yat accent. Think Fran Fine but less. A lot less. And, like in the movie, There IS the occasional Cajun accent because a lot of peple down here (believe it or not) ARE Cajun. Crazy, right? You also have to consider that this takes place in the 20s. The accents and language were different. Next you will start complaining that they used the word "swell" because NO ONE uses THAT anymore. The accents in this movie were indeed the closest to correct out of any movie i have seen that takes place in New Orleans. (by the way, I was very happy to hear that no one in the movie said Nawlins. No one here says that.) Your next error was when you said that there was no wit in the movie. Maybe you just didn't UNDERSTAND the jokes but they were definitely there. I thought it was hysterical when Naveen said "we are from a place far far away" and Ray says "No way! Y'all from SHREVEPORT!?!" The theater here got got a kick out of that! They had dozens of jokes that I suppose only a local would understand... Another thing you said was how they stereotype black people. um no. See, in the movie there was absolutely NO mention of the fact that she was black. Anyone could be a waitress. Cooking just so happens to be a popular proffesion down here in New Orleans. Thoughout the decades there have been chefs that were black, white, italian or any other race you could think of in New Orleans. The racism in this movie is all in YOUR mind, not anyone elses... Just Sayin' Love, Destinie

  • Don 03/14/2011 7:12:00 PM

    La Weeda, This is Donald from the NSBE convention in San Francisco 1985. I hope you remember me. I have been doing an internet search for you. Please go to the online guestbook page for your late brother. I posted a sympathy comment and my email address should be available for reply. I hope this message finds you well. I am sorry that I dont have your address, I lost it a short time after I left the convention to my regret. I do have the pictures though. In case you cant get to that guestbook, my email address is the first letter of my first name followed by the first 5 letters of my last name, then 1906@yahoo.com. Please stay in touch. Don

  • Oreostar 03/11/2011 5:23:00 AM

    Alright people, some of you need to go back an rewatch other Disney princess movies. Let's review: *Snow White - no college education, could sing with cute animals and clean things (Started as a princess) *Cinderella - no college education, could clean and was so pretty won the princes heart (Not a princess until end of movie) *Aurora - no college education, did nothing but sing and then sleep (Started as a princess) *Ariel - no college education, could sing beautifully (Started as mermaid princess and turned to a human princess) *Belle - no college education but obviously has a thing for books, has a good heart (Not a princess until end of movie) *Jasmine - no college education, marries a thief and has an awesome tiger for a pet (Started as Princess) *Pocahontas - no college education, though I think a sequel had her placed in a school but I tend to avoid sequels for they ruin the magic (Started as a princess) *Mulan - no college education, love for her father causes her to become a warrior (Never a princess) *Tiana - no college education, works hard for her dreams (Not a princess until end of movie) Now look at those princesses... honestly the best ones in my opinion is Mulan and Tiana. Mulan because she was a fighter and did the best she could to save her father and still bring honor to her family. Tiana because she teaches that hard work is what gets you places. Since when has princess movies been about historically accurate stories? Mulan should have been MURDERED for being a woman dressing up as a man. When has princess movies been about making little girls want to go to college and not find prince charming? Tiana is the only close one with working so hard to earn money for her restaurant. Didn't Pocahontas marry Smith John or whatever the WHITE man was named? When has Disney made such a point against mixing the races? Disney mixes the economic status all the time, be it the poor Cinderella with the rich prince or the poor Aladdin with the rich Jasmine? I was upset that the firefly bug was killed, and I was even asking my boyfriend, "That rain, it's going to be magic like Beauty and the Beast and bring him back to life, right?" I'm twenty years old and I believe in the magic of Disney happy endings.... If you're busy judging, 'this isn't correct' or 'this makes blacks look bad!' then you missed the point of Disney magic. Don't read into stuff when there really isn't a secret message. For goodness sake, enjoy the movie as if there is nothing hidden in it. There is no secret message, there is no 'lets make a black princess for Obama'. Just let it be a movie. It's all made up. It's Disney magic, grow up. (Ironic as that sounds.)

  • mmhmm 01/18/2011 2:48:00 AM

    If you pause the video exactly when Big Daddy puts the newspaper up to his face in the beginning, the date is April 24, 1926; the Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 hadn't happened yet.

  • Crystal Roma 10/05/2010 10:37:00 PM

    lolol you dont even know what your talkin about hahaha , Old town New Orleans was a disney feature yeeeeears b4 katrina, and Naveed isnt black because love has no color and it dosent matter what color they make him thereteaching children to love themselves for them. Hes spanish by the way. And there being realiztic in 1920 in the south there was segrigation and there not going to lie about it , and p.s they didnt make her a maid because culinary was a more interesting skill, u dont even realize all the jazz refrences and all are missing the point of the whole movie, um by the way it wasnt done wholey in cell it was done in toon boom ,

  • Crystal Roma 10/05/2010 10:37:00 PM

    lolol you dont even know what your talkin about hahaha , Old town New Orleans was a disney feature yeeeeears b4 katrina, and Naveed isnt black because love has no color and it dosent matter what color they make him thereteaching children to love themselves for them. Hes spanish by the way. And there being realiztic in 1920 in the south there was segrigation and there not going to lie about it , and p.s they didnt make her a maid because culinary was a more interesting skill, u dont even realize all the jazz refrences and all are missing the point of the whole movie, um by the way it wasnt done wholey in cell it was done in toon boom ,

  • La Weeda 06/05/2010 9:23:00 AM

    Rosemary, I will not stoop to your level of name calling. You obviously don't have a daughter that is mesmerized by all the white disney princesses to appreciate the timeliness of the movie. I think I acknowledged in my comment that the movie was far from perfect. But as an African American, college educated woman (believe it or not), I have learned to remove the criticalness out of everything I see and do. I can poke wholes in movie depictions all day long (and believe me I have in my younger days), but the proof is in the positive effect the Princess and the Frog had on my daughter's self esteem (i.e. she no longer wants the Cinderella dress, she wants the Tiana dress). To me, this is HUGE. My opinion is simply that...my opinion and I don't have to call anyone a name to express it.

  • Rosemary 05/11/2010 11:03:00 PM

    I'm sorry but La Weeda is an idiot. Not only is the protagonist only a princess at the end when she marries the prince, but she is a friggin waitress who probably never went to college. How the hell is Tiana representative of black people? Your little girl if you ask her what she learned from that film, trust it will be different than what you explained. This review is the only honest review out there. This film was horrible and for black people to not even see the negativity in it just goes to show how ignorant they are. I would rather have no movie depicting my culture than a blatantly supremacist one depicting a culture dead and gone. I'm sorry La Weeda but you are a dumb ass. I don't even think it was a black woman who wrote it. It was probably some white guy posing as a black woman seeing as the name isn't even a realistic one and the explanation of the plot seemed like it was just observed from the trailer.

  • Rosemary 05/11/2010 10:55:00 PM

    I agree wholeheartedly. I am of Hispanic origin but I couldn't help but feel cheated and disappointed when I saw the first scene of that movie. Throughout the whole film, the white, blond blue-eyed girl was the princess while the black girl was the servant. Not only was the plot half-assed and contradicted it's realistic elements in the beginning, but the trailer itself was a big let down to what actually happened. I thought I was going to see a black princess, not some hardworking fool who only gets her dream by marrying a prince. And it's just sad to think so many people gave it such positive reviews. Is it because they want to seem politically correct and tolerant? Or maybe it's because they like how the black race was again put down by the white race. It may not have been racist, but this film was racially bound and poorly contrived. The inconsistencies were horrible, the only decent thing was the animation. And to think black people were involved in the way the film was made I'm appalled that they even let this crap get done. They may have thought it was going to help the black race, but trust me this only set the black race back. Because I guarantee you, black girls growing up will see this and only think that they will amount to a waitress or some wife, never a princess. And that is sad. I hope this film can be remade because the original tale was actually a folk tale from Africa. And they can easily use the Obama girls as references because they are true princesses.

  • chris 04/17/2010 3:24:00 AM

    Did you not catch the part where Tiana and her mother went to the back of the trolley? It was a subtle nod to Jim Crow laws that parents might catch but children would not. I actually think it was a very brave move to cast an AA woman in the role and I think it's a beautiful animated film. I know it's fun to bash Disney, but I think in your haste to find fault you missed a lot good points made by this movie.

  • Mary 02/19/2010 6:41:00 PM

    Bravo!

  • the siren 02/18/2010 3:59:00 AM

    hey,nice article! i had a different take on looking at the psychoanalytical aspect of fairy tales. check out my blog! http://hearthesiren.wordpress.com/2009/12/23/the-princess-and-the-frog-the-black-fairy-tale-that-apparently-wasnt-politically-correct-enough/

  • La Weeda Ward 01/07/2010 7:58:00 AM

    This review is insane. Where do I begin? I saw the movie with my 6-year old African American daughter and the proof of the timeliness of the movie was the look on my daughter's face after the movie and the fact that she wants to read the Princess and the Frog book every night. Yes, we are celebrating in the Obama-era where we are witnessing and yes even imagining Black people representing symbols of grandeur...a Princess or the President of the United States...you pick. This movie was a long time coming, but so was the realization that a Black man has the intelligence and character to rise to the highest office of the world. This movie is simply confirming what we already know...that our little girls are princesses too (and "see Mom Tiana even looks like me"). I don't believe Disney was attempting to write a historically-correct or politically-correct account of Black life... but it correctly depicted the hard work ethic, determination, and character that generations of African Americans know. Was the movie perfect in every regard? Of course not...Naveen could have been from Africa, Raymond the Firefly did not have to have bad teeth, but it did achieve a milestone in socialization (i.e. if my little girl wants to be a princess at least she has one that looks like her). By the way, Mr. Foundas Tiana was not wishing on a star for someone to give her a down payment...she was depicting a metaphor of praying for Divine intervention). Enough said...it is sad that one can find negatives in such beauty.

  • Rodjer 01/06/2010 6:57:00 AM

    This review is spot-on. The feeling that I had when I watched the Princess and the Frog was that the "magic" was missing. For a movie about a princess, it was very mundane. The emotion and wit were missing. Also, I would have preferred if the 1st African American Disney animation had been held to a higher standard. This movie was tantamount to a cartoon about a black boy going to jail and getting out and becoming a prince! So plebian. This has not been a good year for blacks in cinema. But despite all the failings of this cartoon, the Blind Side and Precious were more egregious.

  • Cavana 01/04/2010 1:38:00 AM

    I Couldn't agree more with Foundas. Even as a movie without stereotypes and caricatures of rich southern White men, their spoiled daughters, po� Black folk, incest ridden lower class mountain people, singing and dancing coloreds, Black White race relations, and a pretty big and old religion with African roots this movie sucks the big one. The music is all over the place, some characters are not consistent with the movie�s setting and there is such precedence for a much better job in animation that I wanted my money back. Disney has been the paragon of racial stereotyping since its inception and for me represent many entertainment companies that help lull an apathetic public into accepting harmful divisive ideas of entire groups of people. The fact that the general public and most critics alike are oblivious to this dangerous imagery is the most upsetting thing about this media train wreck. My daughter picked out much of the harmful imagery at only 10 years old. http://heckrazer.blogspot.com/2010/01/disney-remains-animated-stereotype_02.html

  • David Arthur 01/02/2010 2:58:00 PM

    Of course it's what would be expected that we pick apart Disney, and I don't mind hurling stones at Goliath all that much really, but what does anyone expect? Should we really complain that Beauty and the Beast isn't an exact replication of any particular time in France either, or that Snow White can't be called close to any reality that ever actually existed in the fairytale-castle-countryside of Germany? If you want to be thorough, by which I mean credible, then start there and earn the easy pickings of criticizing a story set in the American south. It's Disney for goodness sake! It's a story! The whole turning-people-into-frogs thing should be good enough indication that we might just want to leave our finest toothed combs at the door.

  • Rowland 01/02/2010 1:01:00 PM

    "Where would the reviewer set the story about a black princess?" Uh, perhaps on a continent called Africa in an African kingdom? And maybe just leave it all black so we don't have to deal with that pesky racism? Are the people who take issue with this review also fans of the absolutely ridiculous Pocahontas movie? The Little Mermaid, Snow White, Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty, and Beauty and the Beast deal with racially and culturally homogeneous people in mythical places so they do not have the same responsibility to historical considerations.

  • A.S. 12/27/2009 6:35:00 AM

    I'd love to see how the author of this article would have written this film. Having just seen it with my daughter we were delighted. How on earth would the film do justice to the discrimination and poverty faced by African Americans in New Orleans, then and now, and yet still allow a princess to be a princess (and allow black girls to enjoy being the princess without having to think about race every five seconds), someone ALL little girls would want to be, and not make a fairy tale into a documentary? Well the beautiful animation, fun songs and spirited voice actors made this a wonderful experience, and somehow the film touched on the realities of race in a way that did not deny them but did not engage them. It was respectful and awesome and did the impossible and seriously I want this writer to say what fairy tale he would have written for a princess?

  • mimi 12/22/2009 3:23:00 AM

    This man (Scott) is obviously a ignorant person I pray you are saved from your own dogmatic and lest I say prejudiced views!

  • Bridget 12/17/2009 7:21:00 AM

    Really I'm not understanding your problem other than you're one of those people who reads way too much into things that are meant to be simple. We all know through history that this wasn't the way things were, but really it's Disney i.e. uplifting. I found this movie to be just what I feel Disney needed to get it out of what many fans call its Hannah Montana rut. This movie brings back the days of old and obviously when YOU heard it was a black princess and taking place in New Orleans you automatically condemned the film as being racist. Learn to open your eyes to the innocence of childhood because if you can't do so than you shouldn't be judging a film that requires that of you.

  • Tiana 12/06/2009 2:59:00 PM

    Everyone should see this The Princess And The Frog. It's finally Disney going back to traditional animation!

  • Michael 12/06/2009 9:48:00 AM

    We saw a sneak preview today in Austin. It was wonderful and as a New Orleanian having moved to Austin post-Katrina it was moving. That they took the time to get not just the various accents and NOLA stereotypes right but also the resulting cultural chemistry and character interaction was overwhelming. There were little bits of trivia and background that only a native would pick up on. The reviewer doesn't know what he's talking about. New Orleans is full of stereotypical goofballs and we're proud of that. It's what makes living fun. Without giving anything away, the seeming contradictions and oddites that may be impossible elsewhere are not in Louisiana. Remember that Gov Earl Long was committed then instead of resigning (like would've happened elsewhere), Long refused to give up power, fired the head of the state hospital system and replaced him with a supporter who released him. For ever ridiculous character I thought "Gee, I have met someone like that". Heck, there are singing frogs. If you can accept that then�. As far as the "exaggerated Cajun dialect" that the critic complains about goes my Vacherie born and raised wife was laughing hysterically at the firefly's flat accent. They didn't have to go the lengths they did, but � they did. The movie was great.

  • joe772 12/06/2009 3:48:00 AM

    This 'PRINCESS FROG the story of maddie' movie is not acceptable. Its disturbing how hollywood producers suddenly throw in a black princess during the Obama era, such hypocrites, they don't care about the black cause except to make money, they are a group of White people who probably send their kids to expensive private schools with as little black kids as possible. I will write to Disney to complain. Do not go see it.

  • Kyle Sands 12/05/2009 6:18:00 AM

    This review just wow'd me. Not in a good way. I wouldn't be surprised to see this guy's review on The Lion King - It'd probably be chock full of comments on how it's not accurate to have animals talk and sing. It's a disney movie, seriously. It's not meant to be real. It's meant to be charming and heartwarming and funny. And from what I've heard, this movie is that. The guy that wrote this should get off his soapbox and back off. The humongous fit that he's throwing about Race and historical significance just proves what kind of person he is.

  • Jenkins 12/01/2009 11:37:00 PM

    I can't believe somebody is complaining about a Disney movie being historically inaccurate. Would you rather we watch a Disney princess movie where the princess's dreams don't come true because she's black? I think that'd go over real well. Think of how historically accurate that would be! Of course, the singing frogs would have to go... and the voodoo magic... and the happy ending... and, well, pretty much everything that makes it a Disney movie.

  • Joanna Chin 12/01/2009 3:22:00 AM

    I completely disagree with Foundas' sentiments in the respect that he cannot seem to find anything redeeming about what many consider a breakthrough movie, The Princess and the Frog. When one watches a Disney movie, one does not expect a historical documentary or a complex social commentary. Yes, those aspects are significant and often alluded to, but they are not the focus. The focus is on universal themes of love, friendship, mutual understanding, and the power of dreams. Call it idealistic, naive, even childish, but aren't these concepts ones that we all can relate to, ones that can move people because they ARE important to our lives. And why can't a movie showcase these themes without putting the spotlight on racial relations? There is an extreme when it comes to portraying them realistically: when it reaches that point where it draws away from the themes of the movie. Does it really matter that Prince Naveen has an indeterminate skin color? Does that take anything away from his character? Do random hillbillies and a Cajun bug really represent racist filmmakers' vision? Perhaps American society has become overly sensitive to issues of race if these trivial aspects cause controversy. Foundas has some interesting points, and I respect his consideration of stereotypes that afflict the black community, but I think in this case, he takes his criticism too far. He attacks a well-meaning, beautifully animated movie with developed characters that are so different than what has been seen before in American animated cinema and doesn't give it any credit at all for the progress that has been made.

  • tim 11/30/2009 12:22:00 PM

    LOL, and the award for "looking into something way too much" goes to anyone who critiques this film. ***Alert, its just an animated film you clowns, put your race cards away for once!

  • Miscweant 11/28/2009 4:49:00 AM

    Has Foundas been taking lessons from Armond White in how to judge a movie according to a preconceived agenda & come up with a completely cuckoo take on the film? "Princess and the Frog" wasn't true to the historical facts of the time? Hey I got a clue for Mr. F: THERE WERE NO SINGING FROGS BACK THEN EITHER - IT'S A CARTOON FANTASY MOVIE! Foundas is blind to the film's most subversive element: black Tiana and her southern-fried blonde shiksa friend Charlotte BOTH HAVE THE HOTS FOR THE SAME GUY (a 'mocha-skinned dreamboat' who falls midway between them on a color scale) - I'd call that pretty edgy for a Disney film. The only time Tiana's race is obliquely mentioned is when someone patronizingly refers to her as �a woman of your background� - which IMHO acknowledged the racial reality of the time without beating the audience over the head with it. I seem to recall Foundas wrote an equally clueless review of "Enchanted," grousing that the cartoon-come-to-real-life princess couldn't possibly summon up magically helpful animals because she's no longer in an animated fantasyland - when that was the freakin' point of the movie, that her presence turned Manhattan into an equally magical place. Voice, when the next big animated feature opens... send somebody other than Foundas, okay?

  • Janon 11/27/2009 3:17:00 AM

    Wow. That was a painful review to read. In fact, I only read it because it is one of just two negative reviews listed on the RT web site, and I'll never read a review by this guy again. I wondered what could a critic find wrong in a movie where nearly everyone else gave a good review? Well, now I know. Mr. Foundas had an agenda. It seems no matter how bad or good the movie was, he was going to trash it based on the fact that it has black people in it. It seems like this review was written the day the movie was announced. So Disney creates a movie about a poor working girl who dreams about something more, gets involved with magic, ends up with a prince in the end. Hmmm, sounds like Cinderella? Oops, the princess is black. Whhooa. PC police take notice. Surely Disney fails to convey the true condition of black suffering in the assumed time period. How terrible. This review has the feeling of a midget complaining that Snow White doesn't properly convey the life experience of little people with its depiction of the drarves. Give me a break. We all know that Disney making this movie was like having Bambi walk through a minefield. Seems like they did a phenomenal job. I have two African American daughters and I for one cannot wait to take them to see it. Perhaps when its over, I'll have the need (as Mr Foundas implies) to tell them that, you know, life for blacks back then was a lot harder than it seemed in the movie. I doubt it, but if so, so be it. But chill out man, its not a documentary. Drop the agenda and be a movie critic for once.

  • niceone 11/27/2009 12:12:00 AM

    Whatever the merits of the film, this review is certainly "insidious". Does Foundas want this film to be some kind of anachronistic polemic against segregation? What end would that achieve? Disney does not make historical films, and shouldn't try to do so. The context of the film allowed to play with high drama, vibrant culture and complex societies. Was The Little Mermaid a lesser film because it took place in the ocean and had the temerity to gloss over British maritime exploitation of the Atlantic in the 1700s? Basically, the ultimate problem with Foundas' review is that it distills all the reasons it took so long for an animated film of this magnitude to feature a black lead: if you try to do it, you are simply going to be stuck with knee-jerk haters like Foundas trying to racialize every component of your story. Imagine if we critiqued UP for it's depiction of white lower-middle class adults. Why would you politicize a story that is clearly not about that subject? Foundas re-racializes a film that obviously is seeking to suggest that if the story is good, the characters breathe, and the animation is pretty, black people, white people, Asians, whoever can carry us into a narrative that suggest universal themes. Thanks Mr. Foundas, for doing your best to make sure we articulate distinctions rather than celebrate what is most human about all of, our common love of narrative, romance and beauty.

  • JK 11/25/2009 10:26:00 PM

    Am I the only one who is irritated at the reviews for this movie that have focused on the fact she's a frog most of the movie. Last I checked that was the plot in general. Have you ever listened to John Lasseter talk about his film making approach. It's all story-driven and organic. This movie was not a Disney agenda piece to include a black princess. It began in development at Pixar before it ever came to Disney animationand the Jazz Era New Orleans was a story choice. The african-american princess came from that as did the Middle Eastern prince from a far-off non-existant land since there are no princes in New Orleans. The characters came from the story and not the other way around. I highly doubt Musker and Clements were sitting around in a story meeting going well they said they want a black princess so let's completely change our story so we can hide her. That's an idiotic notion. Conspiracy theories should be saved for your psychiatrist. Do some freaking research before you jump on your high horse next time. Isn't thjat what good writers are supposed to do. And no, I'm not white.

 

Find A Film

for free stuff, film info & more!

Find A Coupon

Popular Coupons

Box Office

  1. Chronicle (2012/ I), 22.0 mil, 22.0 mil
  2. The Woman in Black, 20.9 mil, 20.9 mil
  3. The Grey, 9.3 mil, 34.6 mil
  4. Big Miracle, 7.8 mil, 7.8 mil
  5. Underworld: Awakening, 5.5 mil, 54.2 mil
  6. One for the Money, 5.2 mil, 19.6 mil
  7. Red Tails, 4.7 mil, 41.1 mil
  8. The Descendants, 4.6 mil, 65.5 mil
  9. Man on a Ledge, 4.4 mil, 14.6 mil
  10. Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close, 3.8 mil, 26.7 mil
Movie Title, Weekly Earnings, Total Earnings

Trailers

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy