25% Off Dinner
new york, NY 10028
Does Nancy Meyers hate women? The thought ran through my head not very long into It's Complicated, Meyers's biennial stocking-stuffer about the romantic trials and tribulations of obscenely privileged and narcissistic Southern Californians. Once more into the breach goes Meyers to show us what women really want, this time with Meryl Streep as a Santa Barbara restaurateur "of a certain age" faced with a smattering of life-altering crises: the fading of her youthful visage; the empty nest as her youngest child departs for college; and, in willful defiance of the down economy, an impending addition to her already enormous home. (But won't that make her empty nest emptier?) She is also, like most of the female protagonists in Meyers's films, a highly strung, self-pitying, sex-starved nag defined expressly by the men in (or out of) her life, despite her resolve to be an independent woman. It's complicated, indeed.
Not that Meyers—a global brand whose films have surpassed $1 billion at the worldwide box office—is particularly more charitable (or honest) when it comes to her male characters, who are on hand mainly to act like pigs, usually by ignoring radiant women of their own age in favor of hot-to-trot chippies, only to belatedly realize how good they had it in the first place. Nothing if not an "auteur," Meyers spent most of the '80s and '90s married to the filmmaker Charles Shyer, with whom she collaborated on the comedies Private Benjamin, Baby Boom, and Father of the Bride, and it's telling that the solo features Meyers has made since their divorce (What Women Want, Something's Gotta Give) have increasingly felt like poison-tipped valentines to her former partner. (Meanwhile, as if to complete the cliché, Shyer struck out on his own with the 2004 remake of Alfie, starring Jude Law as a cockney cock-of-the-walk who treats women like Kleenexes.)
In Meyers's most thinly veiled work of self-portraiture to date, Streep's Jane Adler has been sidelined by her philandering lawyer ex, Jake (a puffy Alec Baldwin, giving a ham performance and looking like one, too), in favor of the thirtysomething Agness (Lake Bell), who, in the natural order of the Meyers universe, is a ball-busting gold-digger eager for Jake to sire her child. (Cut to fertility clinic waiting room jammed wall-to-wall with similar May-December "romances.") When Jake and Jane cross paths at their son's New York college graduation, it isn't long before they fall back into each other's arms—and into bed—while Meyers's shopworn comic tropes fall into place: naked fiftysomethings examine their flab and contemplate plastic surgery; naked fiftysomethings feign horror at the sight of fellow naked fiftysomethings; naked fiftysomethings have heart failure during foreplay. And, just for good measure, everybody must get stoned.
Watching this garish fiasco (little helped by the flat, stolid cinematography that has become the norm for American screen comedy), I found it mildly depressing to see Streep, a spry comedienne in the films of Albert Brooks and Spike Jonze, hurdling through this gauntlet of strained whimsy, her every toothy smile and throaty chortle more affected than Sophie Zawistowski's Polish accent. That was before I realized that Jane's soft-spoken, silver-haired divorcé architect, Adam, was being played by none other than the live-wire Steve Martin, in what may be the most anesthetized, emasculated performance he has ever given. (The Cheaper by the Dozen franchise is a movable feast of comic invention by comparison.) Then I was really depressed.
In her last picture, The Holiday, Meyers littered the dialogue (and the title) with references to the classic Hollywood screwball comedies of the '30s and '40s—a tradition to which she clearly sees herself an heir. In It's Complicated, she doffs her beret to the Gauls by having Jake remark that his and Jane's fling is "very French of us," shortly before Adam calls up and invites Jane to a French film festival. Mais, non! If the French Meyers admires so much made a farce about two ex-spouses having an affair—and, surely, they have by now—the characters wouldn't be drawn in such robust caricature, the screenplay riddled with such reductive assumptions about the battle of the sexes. Certainly, the ostensible heroine wouldn't be forced to choose between an unapologetic cad and a veritable eunuch.
In a key moment of It's Complicated, Jane frets over a gourmet dinner for Jake, only to have him stand her up. Cue montage of a forlorn Streep wrapping up leftovers and blowing out candles. Meyers supplies a reason for Jake's absence, but the real explanation is this: She wouldn't know how to write the scene in which he actually shows.
I absolutely love this movie, I still cry everytime I watch it because it hits home !! My husband left me and my three beautiful children and i just completely lost it the first time I ever watched this. My ex watched it for the first time this past christmas, and when the 3 kids were talking about how they felt about the whole divorce and possibly getting back together made him do some thinking which was much needed, but has already forgotten about, but anyways - A GREAT MOVIE !!
I am very judgmental about movies. I detest a lot of movies and cannot believe the way people fall all over themselves to praise worthless movies like the violent movies of the Coen Brothers, which sometimes even win the Oscar for best picture. Having said that, what is the problem with this movie? It's a movie, nothing more. Not totally realistic, not totally unrealistic. It has a fine script, 3 of the best actors in the business, and decent scenes. It is lighthearted, entertaining, no violence, and doesn't play on false and contrived emotions like popular movies I've seen. What is it with these negative comments? Are people jealous? Are they angry about other things in their lives and are using this as an outlet to vent their anger and frustation? I think people need to examine why they write the things they do about an innocuous movie like "It's Complicated."
Great review, the best I've seen on this lame flick. Right on, and write on, Foundas. Roger Angle
You people (except Erica) are all completely miserable; this movie was a slick, good looking, silly, unrealistic, light-hearted, funny, perfectly enjoyable Hollwood rom-com/star-vehicle, nothing offensive about it in the least (which may have been its only problem for me, but not much of a problem for this type of film) - come on, you sour grumps, get a sense of humour!
Does this mean, from the comments above, that people like this just don't exist in California? It was a lighthearted, funny film. I loved the house and laughed a lot. It entertained me. surely that is the aim of such films?
Thank you for this insightful review. This was indeed a dreadful film - self-indulgent, manipulative, with annoyingly pretty sets all in the same tasteful earth tones, and interminable. What a waste of acting talent. My only disagreement with the review: It's not clear to me whom Meyers holds in greater contempt - women, men, or the suffering audience.
Have to agree with the above, I quietly asked my wife if we could leave half way through the movie, to my surprise she agreed! I absolutely hated every fake, simple character in this movie. Still in a bad mood about it.
Your right about steve martins face! What a mess. And you know what, its not complicated..... its just utter rubbish!! I drasgged my other half to see this because its had 5 star reviews everywhere! Have these magazines been paid to make these reviews. Id give it 2 stars at best.
the 'anesthetized' quality of steve martin's performance wasn't helped by the incredibly obvious work he's had done on his face. he's not doing himself any favors there.
Food delivery in NY Online food delivery service and menu to give you the easiest and best updated portal in New York (NY)
i respectfully disagree. meyers WOULD know how to write the streep-baldwin dinner date scene. unfortunately, it would be the same one-note tripe of "i can't believe i'm doing this" that peppered the entire god-awful piece of sh!t. i blame myself for allowing anyone to drag me to this repulsive, oblivious trash. worse offense of all: the movie is completely uncaring about the lives it ignores. i'm convinced now that what they said about people during the depression (that they LOVED escaping to the movies where fictitious characters were leading glamourous lives) was a complete load of horsesh!t. there's got to be someone out there who'll tell us that movie jet-setting, while there was a world war on, & people starving was the most offensive thing imaginable. meyers's love of movies from this era is just rationale for not being more charitable to her audience's more down-to-earth sensibility.
Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...
Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...
More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience
Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info
Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips
Log in or Sign up
Social Connect:Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.
Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:
Sign Up or Log in
Social Connect:Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.
Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:
