-
Moondoggy 07/23/2011 11:13:00 PM
I hated this piece of crap. The only movie I walked out of in at least ten years. I think the last one was "Congo" or "the Mummy". Not sure...
-
j zenday 07/01/2011 1:03:00 AM
Fugitive Cobb is a corporate espionage hired-gun expert at "extraction": lifting secrets out of targets' minds. Drugging them, then joining them for nap time...
Right there you realize how stupid this movie. Absolutely painful.
-
04/19/2011 5:21:00 PM
thank you..
-
H-K 04/04/2011 12:09:00 AM
100% agree with the review. I didn't like this movie at all: it set the bar high, and then it failed to reach it.
-
Joedd 03/28/2011 3:08:00 AM
Nick is a terrible critic. Maybe the village voice needs to shop for some talent...
-
Shawn 03/13/2011 9:09:00 AM
Some advice. Get off the drugs.
-
Shawn 03/13/2011 9:01:00 AM
Strange, because I found this movie emotionally moving on many levels. So for me, the criticism of it being emotionally lacking or the infamous "lack of character development" are completely misguided. This review criticizes Nolan's "inability to let two actors occupy a scene together." Whuh?? Did not Leo and Marion occupy some pretty lengthy and important scenes together? Maybe the reviewer missed those scenes.
One of the best movies I've seen in a long time.
-
Southwestghostjet 02/18/2011 3:07:00 AM
typical fanboy/hipster/wannabe, only knows how to insult. I'm so sick of you weakling psychos lashing out with the intelligence and emotional maturity of a grade schooler. it's always the same cliched bs - 'you don't like my comic genius action film, you must like disney'. When the truth is, this is disney, and you are the one in the sandbox.
The critic intelligently dissects something that apparently defines your being, and you fall apart and go ballistic. But you can't offer insights, maybe explain the depths this allegedly shallow observer overlooked. Attack their character and intelligence instead- thus revealing your own lack of either.
-
Guest 02/13/2011 4:00:00 PM
Good analysis and brilliant writing! You make me feel like I'm not crazy, when everyone around me lauds this movie and all I can think is, "These are supposed to be dreams?"
-
lol 02/08/2011 8:09:00 AM
lol pwnd
-
Lvonhurwit 01/30/2011 2:33:00 PM
A) this premise could have been portrayed start to finish in 45 minutes but of corse it needs to run to 110 mints to be feature length b) nobody would care about this film if Hollywood publicists were not touting Nolan and DeCaprio. Make the movie for say $18M cut 40 minute out of it with just some decent actors and it would have been a nice little cultish movie that would have pulled in a nice ROI Ending needs to stay or it becomes truly without "talk about" as it is simply a commercial (not artistic) device. BTW Ellen Page can't act so congrats to her agent and manager/publicist who are the only talent behind this girl. Promise that when the studio execs looked at final cuts with Nolan in the screening room they were afraid to say anything truthful and were sneaking "important" text messages to stay awake been there - seen it.
-
Nazgulero_0 01/20/2011 8:07:00 PM
Nice review.I wanted to turn the movie off after 15 minutes, I kept watching just so that I could discuss the content of the movie with others. I was, at a basic level, just really bored, and none of the supposedly spectacular CGI could change that. The score was monumental all the time, which anihilates its purpose. There was absolutely no character development, I really couldn't care less about what happened to any of these guys. It was more like a very bad B-movie, I really do not get what all the fuss was about. I understand that the filmmakers need to make their money back, which is fair enough.
I also understand that those who criticize those who do not like the movie generally do so by throwing childish insults at them. That says a lot about the level these people are on.
-
ChesterA 01/16/2011 5:02:00 PM
It's easy to call someone retarded. It's harder to prove them so. Don't be lazy, back up your statements.
You could also say that Mulholland Drive, Donnie Darko, or Leon the Professional is for officially retarded people but you would be wrong. Those are films that I dig and I hate Inception. Nolan's screenplay writing here is comparable to Stallone's ability to write Rocky Balboa. Every single character on the screen might as well be the writer and it's dreadfully obvious. If you were to take a writing class in college or even elementary school that would be the first thing they teach in Creative Writing 101.
-
Benchley 01/09/2011 7:00:00 AM
Nick Pinkerton didn't get all the characters' professions wrong (apothecary and chemist are close to synonyms, and he does call Ellen Page's character an architect, after he calls her a novice recruit - she's both). Anyway, to say he has no right to his opinion just because you think he might have a detail slightly wrong would be like my thinking that you have no right to your opinion just because you don't put the apostrophe in the contraction "it's" or in the possessive noun "characters'" or the period at the end of your last sentence. It would be like my dismissing your comments entirely just because you use immature terms like "idiotic" and "retarded." It would be wrong - these things make me understand that you're young and not very tolerant of differences, but it's your right to feel that way. We're all entitled to our opinions. By the way, mine is in the middle on this film, maybe two and a half stars out of four - it's well-acted, with a reasonably imaginative, well-constructed plot, but I agree with most of Pinkerton's complaints. I also felt that it got a couple of key things about the subconscious wrong and I could barely stand the half an hour of repetitive gunplay in the snow. Rant if you wish, because you're young and entitled to strong opinions, but when you grow up, I predict (or at least hope) that you'll realize that adults can and should have genuine disagreement and differences of opinion over something as individual as one's taste in films without calling each other names.
-
Guest LA boy 01/07/2011 3:54:00 PM
Superb review and spot on.
-
inceptionfan 01/05/2011 10:33:00 PM
oh also to Nick PINKerton, I can't believe you have the audacity to write a review about this movie when you don't even get the characters professions right. Its not mimic, its forger. Its not apothecary, its chemist. Its not novice recruit, its Architect. go watch Yogi Bear. I bet that's on your maturity level
-
inceptionfan 01/05/2011 10:22:00 PM
For all of you who didn't like this movie then you are officially retarded. This is by far the best movie I have seen in a long time. I bet you idiots think "Lady in the Water" is a good movie
-
Afino 01/05/2011 12:12:00 AM
I have to agree with the reviewer. None of the characters are convincing (whatever happened to an actor's ability to "carry" a film?). They all came off as extras reciting their lines- no chemistry, no magic. DiCaprio is beginning to take on that friend's-creepy-older-brother look, and they all have that careful, self-conscious mirror-bred approach to their roles. Unfortunately I felt this falling flat on the part of the cast undermined the rest of the film, which had potential. Furthermore, the special effects weren't effective, and the musical score was of the garden variety. Verdict: the piece is half-cooked.
Oh, and Ms. Nayar: why don't you ask an educated feminist about using the word "douche" as a disparaging epithet before making a silly mistake like that...
-
01/01/2011 10:31:00 PM
why on earth should ellen page provide romantic-emotional counterbalance? also marion cotillard is way sexier than leo dicaprio but someone isn't complaining about that.
my feminist goggles tell me this reviewer is a douche.
-
12/29/2010 5:44:00 AM
What a friendly review for a Ninja Turtle movie with Zimmer score and Leo. Teenagers unite.
'Dom Cobb' sounds a lot like Dummkopf. I bet Nolan drives BMW and sports a 10k time piece.
This 'inception' garbage is like offering a 10 course happy meal and calling it 'nolanelle cuisine'.
PHHHHEWWWW
-
Greg 12/28/2010 2:37:00 AM
Ridiculous from the start. The reviewer doesn't even like the names given to the characters. This movie is so much better than most made this decade. You must have to tear apart movies in order to be considered a relevant reviewer. Take a happy pill.
-
Scharlesbliss 12/28/2010 12:55:00 AM
Yes there are points to mention, such as dreaming differently, and pondering questions such as, "What could we do with the unused portion of our brains?" Granted these are not as obvious and important points that other movies make, but isn't it time for a change? I found that I was questioning our beliefs about psychology, and by the end I was almost believing it was all possible. MAYBE IT IS. Maybe the real POINT of this movie, if you've disregarded my other two reasons as complete crap, is that a really good movie makes you think. You need to have a plot that you try to guess, but in the end you are completely wrong. Inception fulfilled that. And when people say, "You are too stupid to keep up with the movie." you are right, they are wrong. Some people, and quite possibly the person that wrote this review we are commenting on, do not like to think during a movie. But that does not mean that they are stupid. It simply means that they want to sit back and relax and be completely unaffected by the movie, and then forget it completely and go to bed. I think that maybe you are one of the people that couldn't keep up with the plot, and as a result you said that they are only complicated ideas that do not relate to each other. If you had really put some thought into the movie, or watched it several times as I have to understand the complete meaning, you might change your mind. You might not. I think that in the minds of people that enjoy films such as this, this is a masterpiece. I think it is.
-
Elvan 12/13/2010 4:27:00 AM
this type of writing is exactly why i hate film critique on v.v.
-
BamScal 11/07/2010 4:19:00 PM
The movie is entertaining and clever (perhaps, sometimes too clever for its own good). But for all of Nolan's technical excellence and his ability to create layered, exciting plots, he's not really one of those film-makers that have a penetrating vision of human nature. One of the sub-plots of Inception is about sneaking into other people's subconscious; but to do so and find the subconscious so organized (layered like a video game) and inexplicably 'sexless' (like Mr. Pinkerton said) implies a naive understanding of dreams and the subconscious. Compare this to Luis Bunuel's or David Lynch's less consumable but more authentic representations of dreams and the subconscious. This was a topic Nolan didn't need to meddle in to get his main theme across; that is "the examination of the concept of reality". But even as the movie challenged the concept of reality, it didn't add anything beyond what you get from movies like Existenz or The Matrix which is PHIL 101's main topics "What is Reality? Really?!!" (The Matrix is now a common stock in many introductory philosophy classes just to make them more edible for freshmen). I read somewhere that Nolan said the movie was influenced by his readings of J.L. Borges' tales (most probably Borges' tale "Circular Ruins"), but other than mentioning "maze", "paradox" and "dream" a few times, that doesn't count as a real influence (also the movie threw in "catharsis" a couple of times, I couldn't understand what it meant in the movie's context, it was probably just another decorative prop to furnish the movie's profound pose). Inception should be appreciated for pure entertainment value and nothing more.
-
Jake 11/02/2010 4:30:00 AM
All of the comments that I have read in response to this article seemingly only further the reviewer's point. All of you saying that he "clearly missed the point of this film" and that people who don't like this movie are "dumb enough to miss so many points" aren't providing any articulation to what those points ACTUALLY are. This is because there is no point to the movie but except to create the feeling of there being one. Critical thinking of the plot line, if you can actually manage, shows that this film really isn't a masterpiece, but just a collection of complicated ideas that in no way actually relate to each other. You've all been incepted by Inception.
-
ToolMangler 10/20/2010 8:13:00 AM
I am sorry that you failed to see what was being done here. I will give you a hint, don't ever read Les Miserables (The Unabridged version), it will lose you also. My 40 year old daughter and her twin girls loved it and followed most of the twists the first time they saw it. It only took me 5 minutes to bring them up to speed.
-
ToolMangler 10/20/2010 8:13:00 AM
I am sorry that you failed to see what was being done here. I will give you a hint, don't ever read Les Miserables (The Unabridged version), it will lose you also. My 40 year old daughter and her twin girls loved it and followed most of the twists the first time they saw it. It only took me 5 minutes to bring them up to speed.
-
Sebastian 10/01/2010 5:27:00 AM
I think it was way too overhyped. I enjoyed it but not even at one point did it make me thing "HOLYBALLS NOLAN IS A GENIUS!" I mean, some of the ideas were interesting but that doesn't make it an amazing movie...too much fuss about this movie
It was certainly worth watching though in my opinion, but it is what it is-a summer blockbuster
-
Sebastian 10/01/2010 5:27:00 AM
I think it was way too overhyped. I enjoyed it but not even at one point did it make me thing "HOLYBALLS NOLAN IS A GENIUS!" I mean, some of the ideas were interesting but that doesn't make it an amazing movie...too much fuss about this movie
It was certainly worth watching though in my opinion, but it is what it is-a summer blockbuster
-
Vic 09/10/2010 8:48:00 AM
The reviewer clearly missed the point of this film. I saw this film with my mother, my mother! The thing is, half way through I had to use the bathroom and this film acheived that special things that so few films do today. When I walked out of the theatre, I was clearly disoriented, like I was on psychedelics...for about 5 seconds or so. The film achieved in creating it's own world. Leaving one stumbling out of the theatre. The film intended to be high(er) brow summer blockbuster entertainment, as several commenters have mentioned.
It achieved this. The reviewer is pretentious.
-
lowbrow 09/09/2010 8:48:00 AM
Come on! Inception isn't intended to make an artistic statement, present social or political commentary, or delve seriously into the psychology or science of dreaming. It is summer blockbuster entertainment. A blockbuster that dares, at times, to elevate itself beyond the norm in its genre. If you looked beyond that, you missed the fun. Let's all take ourselves a little less seriously and stop branding a film as bad for merely being a blockbuster.
-
Nick H. 09/03/2010 9:50:00 PM
Instead of reading this review and thinking Inception is an over-thought, high-budget, summer blockbuster piece of junk, I find this review to be attention-craving and, quite ironically, incredibly over-thought. Well done, kind sir. You've successfully proved you epically fail.
-
Tim 08/28/2010 5:46:00 AM
Wow, I worded that last sentence bad...hope you understood what I meant to say.
-
Tim 08/28/2010 5:45:00 AM
Clearly there two different kinds of people. Those who value objective reasoning ("thinking" not related to intelligence), and those who focus on personal concerns ("feeling" not emotions). This is a movie for personality types who have the thinking perspective, such as I do. It baffled me how people could not appreciate beauty the way I saw it, but I suppose everyone sees thinks their own way. I just feel sorry for those who missed the point of the movie, especially for those saying that because special effects don't make a movie, because it had special effects automatically said it sucked.
-
Michael 08/26/2010 8:10:00 AM
To all you people who are ripping this movie, please excuse Mr. Nolan for aspiring to make something better than the garbage you are accustomed to seeing and liking, such as Avatar, Twilight, and Michael Bay abortions. You people love these pictures, so you're clearly not smart enough to watch Inception, let alone comment on it.
-
Joseph 08/25/2010 4:01:00 AM
You know your getting old when – you don’t get this movie halfway through it, and relate it to one of those new video games out.
-
s 08/20/2010 7:52:00 AM
The film is a paramount example of false consciousness. So much so that it can be used to explain the concept. It is the biggest load of shit I've seen in ages, precisely because it takes itself so seriously: nauseatingly regurgitative ideas and sensory vacuity ("wallpaper," "overload," call it what you will). The worst thing is the anti-capitalist twist on the application of "avant-garde science": dismantling a monopoly of half the world's energy. Holy fuck! What other trite conceits won't Nolan contrive to make his box office mojo rise. Watch my massive ejaculation all over the screen, climax after relentless climax. First-person shooter dressed up as existentialism? There is no better embodiment of the tumor that is mainstream Hollywood cinema. It thinks it's trailblazing when it fact it's just running to the toilet, up and down a well-worn path. Auteur my ass!
-
Mariposita 08/19/2010 6:40:00 AM
I found this review arrogant and sanctimonious. The "GQ" men in Inception are all in my opinion actors with integrity, genuine talent and intelligence, a rare thing in Hollywood the land of clichés. Inception was cunning, beautifully emotional and shows how the mind is just as vunerable as it is powerful. I'm tired of all the cynics around. Picking holes in Inception because the characters' names are not to your liking or belittling the rocky Fisher relationship is cheap and pathetic, I feel like Nick Pinkerton is a school boy bullying something far emotionally superior. And as for the lack of sex, that's because it wasn't relevant to the plot, stop moaning about it and go buy some porn.
Inception is unlike anything I've seen, The Dark Knight and The Prestige are equally original and I don't even like Batman. I've watched Inception interviews and it's been said that Chris Nolan wanted the actors to experience as much as possible in the action scenes themselves, to make it as truly authentic. It's refreshing to see a film that was for once not at all predictable or condescending. Frankly, I absolutely adored it throughout and definately recommend Inception to anyone with an open mind.
-
nyminute 08/18/2010 3:53:00 AM
Nolan Sucks, I think you have a lot of highbrow, rational, captivating things to say. I just wish you would refrain from being mean to other commenters. It takes away from your well thought- out answers, which aside from telling people they are "retarded", are spot on.
-
Pacer Ceransk 08/17/2010 4:21:00 AM
You pretentious prat. I challenge you to point at one other recent blockbuster that validates its viewers with a plot that isn't brainless or painfully cliche. Who of us isn't just a little bored by all the films that throw in some gore to get tongues wagging or a sex scene to rivet our eyes on the screen.
I'd like a film that gives visuals to keep me interested and plot to keep me talking about it. I'd also like these criterion delivered as a blockbuster at least once a year. No thank you, Hollywood. Thank you Christopher Nolan.
-
Inception Rules 08/17/2010 3:28:00 AM
Seriously???? Incpetion was movie genius. It's plot was so original, and stunning, it kept you thinking way after the movie was over. One commenter talked about how they have never been that un-involved before, yet I found I had never been more involved. Yes, the effects were stellar, but thats not what made the movie the landmark of movie-making that it is. The acting was so deep that I sometimes forgot these people weren't real and that it was all fake. The ending was so amazingly climactic and jaw-dropping that the ending twist left me wondering if a movie will ever rise up to the magnitude of Inception. As another commenter said, the reviewer obviously didn't understand the movie at all. Maybe the reviewer was too simple for the movie. Maybe he was just having a bad day and needed to take it out on something. Inception is stunning. This reviewer's skills and overall appeal is not.
-
Guest 08/17/2010 12:16:00 AM
For those of you who call Inception unique---check this out:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mx_DbslyOFU&feature=related
http://www.fandango.com/dreamscapemovietrailer/1_3005/v14777
(1984: probably before quite a few of you were born.) Sure, special effects have become fantastic but special effects does not a good movie make.
Unless a good movie to any given person is "special effects."
-
Guest 08/16/2010 9:38:00 PM
I'll not go to another Nolan film until he can get back to "story and character" as he did in The Prestige.
It seems that too many Americans are wowed by special effects and "ideas" only. Doesn't make for a good movie to me.
I actually got up and left after 45 minutes. I found another movie in the complex to watch.
Being very familiar with psychodynamics, I found the "fights" with the defense mechanisms to be uncreative and boring. Plus, I'm not shocked and awed by violent explosions of just about everything.
-
Boberton Bob 08/16/2010 9:56:00 AM
I've opened all the negative reviews on the Rotten tomatoes, and am reading them right now. I expected from The Village Voice something fresh and caustic, and this reviewer delivered. Thank you, sir, for not spoiling my day. I was so disappointed with Inception. I wasn't this uninvolved in something I was spending 2 1/2 hours of my life since the last week at my last job.
-
Jason 08/15/2010 2:33:00 AM
"It's obvious that Nolan either can't articulate or doesn't believe in a distinction between living feelings and dreams". This statement alone shows that the reviewer did not understand this movie
-
ChuckConners 08/14/2010 7:39:00 PM
Never in my many years of going to the movies have I ever felt like walking out. NEVER. And I've seen a lot of bad movies. This movie is, without a doubt, the single WORST movie I have ever seen. It's film garbage. It has no soul. I'm glad to see there are other people who agree.
Hated it.
-
Oscar 08/14/2010 12:51:00 AM
I did not like this film. To me it did seem pretentious, predictable and aggravating. I stuck with it hoping it would finally jell, but it never did.
-
stabber 08/11/2010 7:34:00 PM
I just happened to come across this review, as I was curious to see how some professional critics had reacted to this movie, after having seen so many unbelievably positive remarks on IMDB (thought there are several well-written negative ones there too).
I find this a perfectly intelligent review, coming to much the same conclusions as I had after having had the misfortune to see the film last night.
What alarms me most is the amount of intemperate, foul-mouthed and moronic comments from so many of the people who have taken the time to vent their spleen at this reviewer. Whatever happened to civilzed comment ?
Maybe people who are more interested in special effects and so-called "action" will get something out of this film, but anyone looking for a coherent plot and a moderately intelligent script should look elsewhere. What a waste of time, money, and such talent as Ellen Page and Cilian Murphy !
-
Thomas L 08/09/2010 11:02:00 PM
I'm glad I wasn't the only one underwhelmed by this snorefest.
-
Jacob 08/09/2010 10:04:00 PM
So you like ECLIPSE I bet
-
norm 08/08/2010 9:15:00 PM
Let's just boil it down. An incomprehensible unemotional mess. I left 1/2 way through. I've never done that in a movie before. Much acting talent wasted.
-
Max 08/07/2010 1:27:00 PM
Seems to me that many critics tend to believe that they are graduates of some special BFA program that gives them insight into every film. Sorry to say this but this isn't the grainy French film shown in a darkened room to teach sub-plots. Taken at face value, the movie tries to show a sliver of a concept of entering the dream state and the N-levels possible. Only a moron would not be able to follow the layers developed. It is clean, crisp and well done. What else does one want for $12 and 2hr 22min? How much can one explore in this time and to what depth without killing the thrill ride that most movie viewers need to stay focused? Face it, the studio needs to fill seats and there is enough action and adventure tied in to the very psychological exploration the film develops. Film critic, you need a new line of work.
-
amusanitus 08/07/2010 8:17:00 AM
so...having seen both The Sorcerer's Apprentice and Inception, I find the pair of reviews done by you absolutely appalling. The Sorcerer's Apprentice is "fluff", so to speak, and definitely designed for an audience between the ages of 12 and 15. Inception, on the other hand, is a well thought-out, complex film, that actually has a real plot and decent acting. While, yes, it did give me a headache 'cause of the time weirdness, it was still an insanely good movie. This movie actually made me like Helen Page, who I couldn't stand in Juno.
Besides, the lead actor in The Sorcerer's Apprentice is extremely awkward, which made the ENTIRE MOVIE SUPER AWKWARD.
-
Thomas Lines 08/06/2010 7:26:00 PM
I disagree emphatically with your review, and I most certainly cared by the end, but I have to congratulate you on the first negative review of Inception that feels valid. The issues you raise are true or at least an opinion that doesn't feel incredibly overheated and biased.
-
for me to poop on 08/05/2010 7:41:00 AM
syllogistic reasoning, eh?
now, would the class in question happen to be thaught in these us of a, by any chance?
thing is i DO think you ARE infact naive; the REASON being this... oddly rudimentary... (and yes, quite reductive) sense that a peoples so intrinsically apathetic ought to see a movie (no, not a film) billed as a summertime blockbuster, in order to a) rationalize (logic; structure; aesthetic... thematically; etc); then b) contextualize (historically; scientifically... in terms of sheer artistry albeit not solely within the boundaries of the art in question itself). thusly you appear to believe pinkerton's review is, let's say 'under attack'- on the basis of a perceived and profound intellectual insight or vigor (none of which i'd personally reckon it to possess), where as the awful truth is, be it due to modern technology or social disposition, the majority of folk who've opined or reacted negatively to his assessment have done so not out of hatred, ignorance, disdain or lack of cognitive perspective: they've done so simply because THEY CAN. because THEY WILL. it's really not at all a matter of great complexity. our so called "first amendment right" is little more than a collective obfuscation of individual insolence and little more (historically astute as you seem to be, i'm sure you are hip to fellini's observation that "... the west would do well to educate ourselves to silence"). or, as dave chappelle would say, "haters wanna hate, lovers wanna love, i don't even want, none of dee above i wanna piss on you...!".
"... drip drip drip".
know what i'm saying?
-
Catherine 08/05/2010 1:20:00 AM
A good website to find an apartment for rent in New York is www.acerenting.com
-
Catherine 08/05/2010 1:18:00 AM
A good website to find an apartment for rent in New York is www.acerenting.com
-
Marty1234 08/04/2010 9:26:00 PM
Flow charts can be quite helpful...for instance it's good to know which months I needed maxi-pads....
-
Nolan Sucks 08/04/2010 4:42:00 PM
Yes, I am keeping a flow chart, because when I teach my class on Syllogistic Reasoning, I will show my students, how individuals when confronted with rational discourse, employ mostly passionate, irrational, rhetorical flourish, as opposed to actually dissecting and analyzing their own thought. Which will then lead me to the question of what use true logic is beyond computer science if it has no pragmatic value in human discourse (beyond legal cases). Of course, you can't believe I'm naive enough to give away my own work -- but I can give you vivid descriptions of the Universal, Warner Brothers and Fox Lots. I can tell you for instance about the Fox screening theater which is just adjacent to their dubbing room, right across from their Animation department and the bungalow that Jay Roach used to occupy before Hugh Jackman (2005) moved in with Seed pictures. I can also tell you about the Warners Screening room, which is not far from the famous WB water tower that you can see miles before entering its western gate. All of this is irrelevant. The point is people here praised Nolan for the originality of his vision, and when questioned as to the nature of what qualifies his vision as original, no one could point to anything substantive. So "Inception" has become a study in collective memory loss, as nobody seems to recall episodes of Star Trek TOS, TNG, and other works of media going all the way back to Robert Weine's The Cabinet of Doctor Caligari (1919), which addressed all of the same issues Nolan raised, just in more entertaining, compelling, and thought-provoking ways.
-
james 08/04/2010 7:25:00 AM
Thank you Thank you for writing a thoughtful review of this boring movie. This stunk so bad like the rotten tomato it truly is. Cheers!
-
for me to poop on 08/04/2010 4:12:00 AM
dude, a flow chart? seriously?
and pray tell, what would the names of them "screenplays" you've been "payed for" be? perhaps we could extend this tread to record numbers by posting observations on how enlightened your work has left us uneducated, illiterate boobs. know what i'm saying? boobs? nah!
-
Nolan Sucks 08/03/2010 10:28:00 PM
Lucid Dreamer -- I've already been paid for my screenplays; that's why I have time to indulge my pursuits. My underground ranting on various websites is something of a Socratic experiment, to challenge the thoughts of individuals when they are reduced to thought alone. However, I've yet to see one valid logical argument. In fact, I'm using a flow chart to map these comments. My initial hostility was precipitated by a commenter who ripped apart Nick Pinkerton on a personal level without providing any substantive logical reasoning. I later challenged each individual on their assumptions and showed why their assumptions were wrong or flawed in some way. Every rebuttal I've received has been filled only with passion and slander, and in fact has not addressed any of my assertions. So the fact that you liked "Inception" is great, and besides the point. I've got no problem with that, especially since you haven't even bothered to attack the reviewer. By the way, if you've ever worked with the studios to develop a property, it's very much as Douglas Adams has described it: "Like trying to cook a steak by having a hundred people come in and breath on it."
-
irena 08/01/2010 7:15:00 PM
my thoughts almost exactly. this is the 13th floor and dark city and myriad other dreams within dreams plus mission impossible 2 - the bad one - populated by munchkins - practically all the cast look like angsty teen minatures. Pete Pothelswiate steals the show and he's basically dead.
-
IwasTIGHTlastNIGHT 08/01/2010 12:50:00 PM
yeah sean, AND... AND... while you're at it, how 'bout valerie solana's highly intellectualized, profound, studied, and not-at-all-delusionally-self-agrandizing-public-forum-sex-starved-batshit-ranting masterpiece of (shall we say 'post post-modern') literature 'the scum manifesto', you corrupt piece of worthless cunning male imsensitive shit you!
-
NolanSucks 08/01/2010 8:58:00 AM
Sean -- metacritic? Hahaha? You don't know squat about criticism do you? The fact that Ebert's opinion is taken into consideration should scare you more. Most mainstream critics are bound to give a highly anticipated film a good rating, especially since they don't want to be the odd man out on Rotten Tomatoes or Metacritic -- this of course results in higher sales because nobody wants to read a negative review about a film they love, (especially when it's for all the wrong reasons, like your obvious juvenile infatuation with Inception). Yes, this movie is barren. BARREN!!!! Tell you what, go read the following: "Repent Harlequin, Said the Tick Tock Man"; "The Library of Babel," "Valis," "Pale Fire," "American Tabloid," "The Wanting Seed," "Plato's Republic," "Livy's The Rise of Rome," Gogol's "Dead Souls," Angela Carter's "The Bloody Chamber," Burroughs' "Cities of the Red Night" and then you'll realize that Nolan's brain queef is a rotten, waste of time. The couplet "I was the shadow of a waxwing slain/by the false azure of a window pane" has more intellectual stuffing than that 2 hour 28 minute soul sucker. Now go make yourself smart, so that your comments are actually valid.
-
charlie st. cloud 07/31/2010 1:47:00 PM
... i miss you, tupac!
-
Sean 07/31/2010 8:04:00 AM
No. This review missed the mark greatly. "Barren"?!??!!? Are you kidding me? You are an incompetent fool who does not deserve to review movies in general. I could do your job in a second.
The fact that metacritic takes your opinion into their rating system really scares me. It does.
No.
Just no.
-
Marty1234 07/30/2010 6:13:00 PM
Would of been great had they exchanged casts with "a serious man"....
-
Stephen 07/30/2010 3:26:00 AM
You want to be captivated and moved by a dreamlike atmosphere, go see Toy Story 3, not this generic action pic with jumbled plotting concealing a confused premise.
-
Nolan Sucks 07/29/2010 10:58:00 PM
Shady, that was the best you could come up with? You really believe "Inception" was so profound that I couldn't understand it? You really believe that if people don't like this garbage film it's because it's too "intellectual"? Puh-leaze, this movie was such cookie cutter blaise bullshit. There was nothing to understand. A fortune cookie haiku has more depth. I've seen movies that would make your head spin, and "Inception" doesn't hold up. I guess, this movie is more complicated than Electrodynamic Field theory, or assembly language. This movie was diarrhea for people who get high on diarrhea floating around in their toilet bowl minds. Just because the film has a title whose meaning you had to google to understand doesn't mean the film was profound, buddy. And Nolan is laughing, not because of people like me, but because of diarrhea brain saps like yourself who are willing to shell out thirteen bucks for diarrhea movies like "Inception." Keep paying, sucker.
-
Shady80 07/29/2010 7:52:00 PM
Nolan Sucks (aka Douche), you really are the reason amazing directors like Nolan laugh when they count their money. It's obvious that your stupid ass didn't understand this movie. Or Memento, or The Prestige. You prob thought the Batman films were bad too. Which speaks even louder about your stupidity. You and this critic both deserve to fornicate each other with an iron stick.
-
trollhunter 07/28/2010 3:05:00 PM
troll gonna troll~
-
Michelle 07/28/2010 1:33:00 PM
You're seriously ridiculous. Really you have to make fun of a movie just because they do something unique. This movie was the best and most unique thing in years and I personally feel sorry that you couldn't take your head out of your ass for one minute and enjoy the good plot. This is a real thing that people do its called lucid dreaming sorry if its too high for your comprehension.
-
Catherine 07/28/2010 12:12:00 AM
another good website for houses for sale by owner in New York is www.acewebads.com
-
Nolan Sucks 07/27/2010 9:25:00 PM
That's what I thought. No intelligent defense other than insults and vague generalizations.
-
Derek 07/27/2010 11:58:00 AM
Can't believe someone can critique a movie and not even understand half of it. Obviously this movie just went over yours, and most of the people posting here's, heads.
-
turk 07/27/2010 8:51:00 AM
... why it's not off topic at all, you!
may i recommend match.com? lotsa sales for owners by house.
yeah that's right, comment #150, bitches!
-
The Man 07/27/2010 1:19:00 AM
This review was pretty much trash and all the people agreeing with him are just as sad.
Just about every movie this summer was garbage.
This one was the only movie to actually hold my attention. And Im sure I missed quite alot of the little interesting details as well.
The only good summer movie.
the rest of you can eat it, and just stop watching movies because their isnt going to be much out there to entertain you if this movie didnt do the job.
or maybe Im underestimating the ease of amusement for idiots. As the sorcerers apprentice seemed to capture our critics attention so soundly.
SAD
-
Ryan 07/26/2010 11:36:00 AM
This is a shit review.
-
johnny 07/26/2010 6:36:00 AM
I thought the movie worked up until he goes through the rules with the prodigy and treats her like crap. the problem is the reveal that the wife isnt real is much too early in the movie, they should have introduced her as a dream participant.
The problem is leonardo's character is not likeable and too dark, thiers nothing to root for. They needed a romance between leonardo and the prodigy, thiers no clear antagonist in the movie and the wife and the chinese dude fizzle as the anatagonist, dicaprios character is more antigonistic and a jerk wich makes him not rootable as a robber (or were they dream therapists, I really dont care after watching lol). they really needed a buddy from the team and a romance for this movie to work and the reveal that the wife isnt real until the end discovered by the prodigy. He has no on screen chemistry with the lead (not since titanic in my opinion has he had a good romantic lead) and does with the prodigy but nothing blossoms and its underplayed.
Plus the movie felt like nolan got an idea to remake shutter island (created later yes) and mix it with the matrix and dreamscape, then got high on lsd while watching citezen kane and tried to make it david lynch and failed.
The only cool thing about the movie is when the landscape bends, super powered interior decorators arent enough to wow me. Thiers no cool matrixy things they can do other than manipulate landscape wich is kind of boring unless your into archetecture.
Dicaprio has no redemptive qualities that make him likeable and thiers only one joke in the entire movie. Dark, depressing anti hero movies Im tired of.
Thats just me, i know alot of nolan fanboys feel otherwise. For me Inception felt like a bad movie, invading and wasting 2 1/2 hours and doing nothing but robbing me of 10 bucks and a sore ass.
-
Scott 07/24/2010 9:58:00 PM
Pinkerton's review reads like a rant by an bitter teen. Personally, I don't care how much he resents DiCaprio for resembling a male model (good luck in that battle), or his disdain for director Nolan, (whom Pinkerton must feel is just among the luckiest of Hollywood directors for getting any applause for his previous blockbusters). I just want an objective review of art, not a regurgitation of the same reasons to dislike Hollywood conventions. (Sometimes they work.)
Every film can't be on the cutting-edge of challenging our moral state and pathos while championing certain politics.
But, then again, any reviewer playing to a tough crowd like the convention-resistant Village has my sympathies. You're allegiance to a cultural paradigm is probably prerequisite.
-
William 07/24/2010 11:38:00 AM
I agree with this review. Inception's world(s), plot(s) and character(s) were spoon fed to the audience. And everyone who has been disgustingly hurtful and insulting to this reviewer needs to take a long look at themselves in the mirror. Aren't you inspired to be better people by the characters in the movies you claim to like? You act more like those "projections" than actual people. Is this reviewer feeling alien in your dream? Should I have given you a spoiler alert for that question?
-
Kevin 07/24/2010 9:07:00 AM
My wife and I go out to the cinema at least once a week and despite having experienced bombs in the past thirty or so years like Congo, Ishtar and the Mummy, I never walked out on any of them. There had to be a first and Inception it was. I felt like a caged ferret with someone poking me with a stick. I HAD TO GET OUT! IT WAS HELL! I have seen tripe, I have seen drivel, but this was punishment for every past sin I have every committed. If exiting the theatre was impossible I would have chewed my arm off to do it. Sorry Nick, I should have read your review first.
-
bobby 07/24/2010 9:06:00 AM
you ofcourse have no idea what you talking about. maybe you need to awake from your dream of being a troll..
-
Mitch Rodgers 07/24/2010 6:27:00 AM
A truly dismal film, embarrassingly faux-intellectual, juvenile, clunky with no characterisation to speak of, felt to us like the kind of film that teenagers might describe as really 'deep' and 'awesome'. The most annoying thing is that people who like it persist in saying that its detractors don't get it because it is too clever!!! Tedious in the extreme.
-
Mark Wollaeger 07/24/2010 2:57:00 AM
Shouldn't a reviewer be required at least to understand a little bit about a movie before panning it? Seemingly Pinkerton isn't too bright -- tripping, as he does, over the relationship between dreams and film formulas that is the film's central conceit. You want sentiment? Watch a soap opera.
-
Steve 07/24/2010 2:37:00 AM
Nick,
I saw the movie last night, and I started to feel a bit "out of touch" reading all the glowing reviews from the mainstream press. Your review captured my experience exactly. Thank you!
I kept thinking about recent movies like 11:14. In that movie, I was surpised and stimulated by the non-linear aspects (even after watching lesser movies like Nolan's Momento), and I enjoyed and cared about the characters. Inception was just big budget boring.
-
Eric 07/24/2010 12:58:00 AM
Wow, man. To each his own...but let's at least get some of the facts straight before we rip the movie to shreds.
"Fischer Jr. dreams of a car-chase shoot-out in the pouring rain"
Wrong. It was Yusef who was dreaming. It was Fischer's subconcious trying to wake him up. If you couldn't grasp that early concept, I can see why you didn't like the rest of it.
As for the comparison to We Own The Night, I was locked in to Inception from the jump...fell asleep TWICE during We Own The Night.
So, I say again, to each his own...but as a paid "professional", you should at least get your facts straight.
-
nate 07/23/2010 11:14:00 PM
This critic is a complete idiot. Half this movie is about the human heart/soul, how can it be barren? It has super refined style, none of the special effects are cheesey or overbearing. And the character of Dom Cobb is brilliant: he is a realistic protagonist/hero in that he is very much human, not defined by perfection. Clearly he must regret this review. I don't see how he cannot. The only people I know who didn't like Inception are very simple minded.
-
Todd 07/23/2010 2:06:00 AM
horrible review...
Easy to see how simple minded you are when giving sorcerer's apprentice a better rating than inception. lol
Maybe Inception was too smart for these kinds of people?
Missed so many details... It's the small things that count the most.
-
Loache 07/22/2010 10:47:00 PM
Fitting, because I barely remember this movie.
-
Ellen 07/22/2010 7:55:00 PM
History does not remember critics.
-
Phil 07/22/2010 11:12:00 AM
The new Nicki Minaj video has more grace than the entirety of Inception.
-
FilmBuff 07/22/2010 10:20:00 AM
As movie making becomes more and more advanced in terms of the technology used, films have less and less heart and soul and are for the most part forgettable. Nolan is smart and competent, but his films have zero heart/soul. Ironic that the movies of the first Star Wars trilogy are his favorite films - those three movies are a prime example of epic blockbusters with special effects BUT with unforgettable characters, stories and settings. Nolan doesn't seem to have learned a thing from his favorite movies.
-
Dan 07/22/2010 7:07:00 AM
This movie is much worse than Mr. Pinkerton suggests. Ellen Page acts exactly like she does in the Cisco commercials and makes the same impression - none. I am supposed to care about corporate spies? I do not. The technology of mind invasion is simply assumed. The visuals are not dream-like - who dreams of collapsing cities? No suspense, no tension - a waste of oceans of money and my valuable time!
-
Sheezy 07/22/2010 5:56:00 AM
So sorcerers apprentice is good and inception is crap, c'mon son....
-
Tom 07/21/2010 11:23:00 PM
No, this review isn't garbage, pretentious twits who dismiss the review as garbage for lack of a better argument are garbage.
-
Dave 07/21/2010 8:27:00 PM
Doesn't address mental rape? I mean, he doesn't CALL it that, but isn't that like, ya know, the main theme of the movie? His wife? Blah blah blah? I mean, I found that to be very basic here. Was I alone?
-
Wow. 07/21/2010 8:22:00 AM
Looks like Pinkerton missed the point entirely. This review is utter garbage.
-
Matty 07/21/2010 5:36:00 AM
I hate reading critic reviews, and this is exactly why. I don't care what anyone who reads this page has to say. The whole point of going to the movies is to be entertained, and that's excatly what this movie does. Poor character development? Pretty much yeah. Sub-par plot? Maybe, but the vast majority will disagree. But so what? The bottom line is that Inception looks at the dream world in a way that's fresh and blends in the action and visual effects that put asses in the seats, which is what directors and actors are supposed to do. Furthermore, neither Chris Nolan and the actors nor the audience gives a flying **** what critics or people who comment on them have to say. I don't care how articulate or cynical you can be, you will never change the movie industry no matter how hard you try. The only thing that can truly judge a movie is the general audience, which is what movies are made for, don't give me that crap about film school and being able to "professionally" critique them. People are loving this movie so far, and rightfully so.