-
10/25/2011 11:48:00 AM
Tad long and boring, wait for tv.
-
04/21/2011 4:44:00 AM
Your cynicism is showing in this review, do did your really go into it expecting to enjoy it?
-
Laneybug618 04/21/2011 4:05:00 AM
at the end of scream 3 ,u know how scream opens the doors without him infront of it....well he is stil alive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
Murmurteen 04/13/2011 9:10:00 PM
DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
Murmurteen 04/13/2011 9:09:00 PM
"stupid-acting-smart movie experience..." goo goo ga ga... babytalk? speak english you hipster dweeb.
-
Murmurteen 04/13/2011 9:04:00 PM
boy you're cute. seriously - being witty proves squat ... self-indulgent creep.
-
Steve 04/13/2011 5:32:00 PM
I'm confused, isn't the whole point of a review to give a star rating?
-
Dickyroberts 04/13/2011 7:08:00 AM
i so hope he didnt ruin the ending!
-
Ginger Ranger 04/13/2011 7:05:00 AM
Lol you're fucking idiots. Ignore the fan boys Nick/Village Voice.
-
Rene 04/13/2011 4:30:00 AM
Obviously, you are one of those critics who hates horror movies! Why waste yours and our time by writing a review which clearly shows your disliking for this type of genre.
A note to the editors at Village Voice, please find a critic who appreciates and respects the genre as much as horror fans do. Don't waste our time with reviewers like Nick Pinkerton. Let him review movies with Meryl Street and violins.
-
Leorok 04/13/2011 4:17:00 AM
you are an idiot.
-
Jack 04/13/2011 4:11:00 AM
This is a terrible review - it's only a paragraph and gives no specifics. I won't be coming to this site for news or reviews.
-
Leighton_mueller 04/13/2011 3:10:00 AM
Whilst I agree with your comments about the review, it IS true that Scream revived Craven's career - it had been flop-territory since A Nightmare on Elm Street. Deadly Friend, The Serpent and the Rainbow, Shocker, The People Under the Stairs, Vampie in Brooklyn - all were major bombs, despite two of them - Shocker and Stairs - being amongst his best movies. Even Wes Craven's New Nightmare, an arguably better film than Scream, was considered a major box office disappointment in 1994.
-
Leighton_mueller 04/13/2011 3:04:00 AM
I get the distinct feeling that this guy hasn't even seen Scream 4. If he has, then why send a critic with an obvious disdain for a genre he believes he's above to see Scream 4?!
-
Jason Rivera 04/13/2011 1:47:00 AM
Despite this horrible review, This movie will be awesome, Whether you cant put your big boy pants on or not & admit it. Maybe you should just watch Hannah Montana or Justin Biebers' Never say Never.
-
Kane 04/13/2011 1:47:00 AM
How did Scream revive Cravens career he was at the top of his game back then and was choosen as such. Scream revived the dying horror industry. This review is a hack job cut paste didnt like it
Balls to this site
-
Eagle934 04/13/2011 1:45:00 AM
First of all,this review is incredibly short.It explains jack shit.I write reviews as a hobby and there longer than this.They may not be professional,but this is pathetic.Like Jay said,did this take,what,fifteen minutes? And judging by the review,you either know squat about the Scream franchise or you just don't like the movie.Even if it isn't good,this is still no excuse since you give no reason.Overlong? Are you high? It isn't two-two and a half hours long.Reason is key when you wanna give an answer as to why you didn't like it.I'm not trying to sound all professional,but this is incredibly lazy.Bottom line,FUCK.YOU.
-
04/13/2011 1:38:00 AM
And Jesus, how long did it take you to write this review? ten, maybe fifteen minutes tops? I think I've read facebook status's about how beautiful the sun was today longer than your review.
-
04/13/2011 1:36:00 AM
Exactly critics that are fans of horror need to review horror. As a game journalist I am not a fan of 2d/3d fighting games, simply put I know nothing about them. So I would not create some fancy words, mash some personality behind those words to make my review look legit, and call the game shit simply because I'm ignorant to that kind of game.
-
04/13/2011 1:31:00 AM
This "review" doesn't even explain why its such a low score, it simply suggests a 'just believe me' approach to that it sucks. A personal message to this site: I suggest you fire Nick, and find yourself a better writer who knows a thing or two about movies.
-
Dan 04/13/2011 1:29:00 AM
Obvious bias if you didn't like the first one; why waste your time writing this?
-
Scb4t 04/13/2011 1:12:00 AM
You are obviously not a fan of horror so why do you even bother reviewing them! You critics and your stupid bias...
-
Lauren 04/13/2011 1:06:00 AM
Wow. You suck.
-
Pooplover 04/13/2011 12:02:00 AM
It was a great movie, you just aren't a fan. I mean, look at the shit sequels we have now. At least you got one, you indecent, fucking troll.
