Top

film

Stories

 

Natalie Portman Goes Batshit in a Tutu in Black Swan

Niko Tavernise
Ballerina, going to pieces

A near-irresistible exercise in bravura absurdity, Darren Aronofsky’s Black Swan deserves to become a minor classic of heterosexual camp—at the very least, it’s the most risible and riotous backstage movie since Showgirls.

Niko Tavernise

Details

Black Swan
Directed by Darren Aronofsky
Fox Searchlight
Opens December 3

Related Content

More About

Like this Story?

Sign up for the Events Newsletter: What's happening in town? From underground club nights to the biggest outdoor festivals, our top picks for the week's best events will always keep you in on the action.

Privacy Policy

Tchaikovsky’s Swan Lake has had a spooky quality at least since Tod Browning appropriated a few bars of it to introduce his 1930 Dracula; Aronofsky takes that creep factor all the way to the moon. Not body but ballet horror, Black Swan is a Red Shoes/Repulsion/Carrie mash-up, slathered with Dario Argento cheese. At the same time, the movie is recognizably Aronofskyian in its strenuous, sensationalizing goofiness. This epic actualization myth is a distaff version of The Wrestler, equally saturated in gore-soaked, self-mutilating histrionics.

Like The Wrestler, Black Swan is an acting vehicle—it exists to document a highly physical, totally immersive performance. Rather than fueling a geezerly comeback, however, the movie is propelled by Natalie Portman’s game determination and near-excruciating anxiety as Nina, a dogged, delusional, mildly masochistic, possibly virginal, and severely repressed little ballerina plucked from the ensemble to dance the Swan Queen and, as is customary, her evil twin in a new vision of Swan Lake concocted by the sleaziest ballet master to ever slime Lincoln Center (Vincent Cassel).

Frequently heard to whimper that she just wants to be “perfect,” Nina is one tense chick. But, really, who could blame her? Projecting her shadow all over the Upper West Side, the tremulous child is stalked and brutalized onstage and off-, as well as in her dreams; she’s taunted by trolls and hobgoblins as she scurries home to the apartment-cum-haunted-house, a veritable nursery for Rosemary’s baby, that she shares, under the name “Sweet Girl,” with her scary, infantilizing mother (Barbara Hershey, hair pulled tight to pop her eyes and so witchy she should be standing in a pool of Morticia Addams goo).

Navigating the clattering subway of terror and twisted catacombs of Lincoln Center (surely built on the site of an ancient Indian burial ground and haunted by the souls of evicted tenants), Nina fights bravely for her role. She bites the ballet master’s arrogantly curled lip and draws blood to get it; he then tells Nina to practice “touching” herself at home. The sweaty Sturm und Drang surrounding Sweet Girl’s first orgasm is a production number in itself. (Portman long ago displayed her dark side in Closer, although, admittedly, she didn’t have to pole dance en pointe.)

Aronofsky has a near-documentary fascination with the minutiae of physical training, but in the end, Black Swan is all about penetration, blood, and psychosis. Mind games multiply en route to Nina’s inevitable swan song. The prima ballerina that the youngster replaced (Winona Ryder) has cast a malign spell on her, and Nina is beset by a sexually confident rival (Mila Kunis) from faraway San Francisco, who tries to steal her part—or maybe her heart—during the course of an after-work ecstasy-crazed bacchanal. Even worse, Nina is afflicted by mysterious, running-sore stigmata, some of it self-induced. Tormented by mirrored doppelgängers and her mother’s expressionist canvases, her brain is fried well before she goes totally goth-girl for the climactic walpurgisnacht.

Black Swan is a hoot—even more so if one identifies Aronofsky with the haughty maestro who swans through the movie like a bobblehead cadaver—and compared to the ponderous pulp mysticism of The Fountain, Aronofsky’s suffocatingly self-important attempt to out-kibitz the Kabbalah, it’s surprisingly fluid. The wall-to-wall Tchaikovsky (and “Tchaikovsky”) certainly helps, but credit the filmmaker: Despite (or perhaps thanks to) his shock cuts, zap hallucinations, off-kilter framing, moody chiaroscuro, and repetitive creepiness, Black Swan is something like a 100-minute swoon. The camera lurches, leaps, and pirouettes; in some scenes, it feels as if it’s being tossed around the stage along with Portman. Kitsch this bombastic becomes something primal.

 
  • 07/02/2011 7:55:00 PM

    Wow! Is this writing in love with itself or not!? It's entertainment in its own right, and a gratifying hyper-film-soaked reaction riff on the film. But isn't the film itself worth writing about? Isn't there something like film criticism still left?

  • Owen Richardson 06/09/2011 11:06:00 AM

    Wow. You folks just don't appreciate good film writing when you see it. I didn't like the movie much, but Hoberman nails it.

  • robertshaw 03/15/2011 6:37:00 PM

    I don't know if answers.com is really that great of a source but here is their opinion on the subject: "You are to capitalize the word english when it's used as a school subject, written in terms of a language we speak or if referring to the English culture."

  • Mushy 03/06/2011 4:07:00 AM

    It's thesaurus, not theosaurus. Or is that just "plain English" and why do you capitalize english btw? :)

  • gregory 02/03/2011 9:51:00 AM

    i wilted literally in 40 degree heat and opted for the cinema ! Hoberman's review was spot on folks . hershey was a freak show . Are you sure that was Portman's first foray into chemical substances ? And why didn't the cameraman buy himself a tripod . cheap ,tacky and crappy -sydney

  • gregory 02/03/2011 2:11:00 AM

    isn't there anything else to do in manhattan except see crappy self indulgent movies? I' m going to the beach . when warren beatty was asked to dance he said I don't !

  • 'Ster 02/02/2011 10:44:00 PM

    yr an idiot.

  • Guest 01/30/2011 10:27:00 AM

    deleted

  • Pickledhen 01/26/2011 6:27:00 PM

    shit man - that's not the film I've just seen I was bored to buggery.

  • 01/22/2011 2:00:00 PM

    It takes ten years to become a ballerina Mr Hoberman, and Ms Portman only had a year. In your case it will take another ten years for you to become a writer as you are clearly not there yet. You write as though trying to impress an examiner with your new found knowledge of the theosaurus or other irrelevant topics. Grow up, get out of the classroom and write plain English. Don't pad out or try to disguise your lack of understanding of the film by sidetracking mentions of other films that we probably haven't seen. How arrogant of you to assume that we have seen them. This was never meant to be a lesson in ballet perfection, rather imperfection. Films are made to entertain and this one does just that, a point that you sadly missed. Stick to the subject which is THIS film, not numerous others you care to mention and learn to write plain English. You don't have to impress us, we are not the examination board.

  • Bent Rasmussen 01/20/2011 4:42:00 PM

    Precision reviewing. And I do like the scchhwuuuung of your language, it sometimes feels like I have to constantly wipe your cum out of mine eyes to be able to see.

  • Alessandra 01/16/2011 8:31:00 AM

    He lets us know. He thought it was trash, that Portman acted her behind off, that Aronofsky turned what could have been a thrilling examination of ballet into a kitschy melodrama, and that you still might want to see it. Couldn't you see that in the review? It's all there.

  • Alessandra 01/16/2011 8:29:00 AM

    Put down the Confederate flag and learn to write properly, fresh out the burb ghetto.

  • Caernavon 01/16/2011 8:27:00 AM

    "Its grittiness." It's = IT IS Its = Belongs to it. Please open a dictionary and grammar book once in a while.

  • Cap 01/11/2011 11:08:00 AM

    one of the most entertaining and helpful movie reviews I have ever read!

  • Danny 01/09/2011 6:38:00 AM

    Agreed, this review tries harder than "Nina." Sheesh, maybe the writer needs to find his "dark side" in order to stop writing such overwrought crapola. Either write a novel, or write a review. Either way, get over yourself, Hoberman, you're making the audience want to scratch themselves.

  • Guest 01/04/2011 9:46:00 PM

    deleted

  • W Montani 01/02/2011 6:23:00 PM

    Hoberman's combo adjectives/adverbs are so thick and unwieldly, that they bore. Clearly this person is frustrated because he/she just doesn't have the creativity spark to write a sucessful novel; it must be painful, because Hoberman clearly wants to pass that pain onto us. Here's a suggestion, Hoberman---try writing simple English, instead of trying to impress us with your tired, canned, stale vocab list from high school. As a result of this inept review, I have to go to another source in order to get a simple feel for the film. W Montani

  • JayRo 01/01/2011 11:09:00 PM

    Now that this article has been cited in the plebeian Slate magazine, I no longer like it. There is no room in the critical world of film review for popular opinion. Only counter opinion is valuable. Down with Robbespierre.

  • Joelcuerrier 12/26/2010 5:12:00 PM

    You know what's kitsch? The Village Voice! What's even more kitsch? J. Hoberman, whose europhilia always made him a grand critic to detest most everything American, as a matter of principles. How dare an American movie be pretentious? Only Euro-trash knows how to do that shit, right?

  • 12/24/2010 3:20:00 AM

    An oddly readable review that seemingly forgets that its purpose is to let the reader know how the reviewer felt about a particular film, as opposed to needless pretension.

  • 12/23/2010 5:51:00 PM

    Okay,Worst review ever! I suggest you watch this movie like a normal person instead of being so picky just so you can write that stupendous line on how something went wrong in frame no.21,geez!

  • Esky 12/22/2010 6:40:00 PM

    A compendium of in your face crap soooo serious and meaningful. Natalie proving she earned her Harvard degree and brainy rep. It's hysterical in every sense. A year of dance practice to watch Wynona regret her lost career and Barbara Hershey go goth. Mila Kunis looks like she's suppressing the giggles. Red Shoes anyone? Fantasia? Whatever....

  • Busenyu 12/22/2010 7:20:00 AM

    I stumbled into Hoberman's reviews,directed there by the magic of google Chrome.His writing reminds me so much of a professor who wrote and taught at Montana State[?] in the 50s and 60s and whose use of language was compelling! For me, reading Hoberman was the shock of recognition: the writer who sounds so much like Leslie A. Fiedler..I recommend Fiedler's "No! In Thunder" Essays on Myth and Literature Beacon Press Boston fiedler's

  • Jihad_g 12/20/2010 9:26:00 PM

    Dude. STFU.

  • Voodooghost 12/18/2010 6:31:00 AM

    What an irritatingly cute review. You're too cool for school, Mr. Writer.

  • Fivext 12/15/2010 2:17:00 AM

    Possibly the worst movie I have ever seen

  • Sopeheadchurch 12/14/2010 6:39:00 AM

    Goodness white boy put down the dictionary and ivy league cutesy witticisms and review the film like ur frat boy friends aren't calling you a fag, cause deep down inside you know the shit is brilliant. Sounds like you read eberts review and threw ur little Hipster slant to it. And lol at Scott or whatever the fuck trying to call out the dancing. My homegirl who I went to see it with is a professional dancer and she was giving nothing but props to the performance, stop trying so hard to be an authority on "art".

  • scott 12/13/2010 4:26:00 AM

    Hoberman doesn't say any of that: the phrase "bravura absurdity" doesn't mean that, necessarily. It might mean that, or something similar -- but the point is this review 'dances' around the actual movie and doesn't say anything actually meaningful about it.

  • anonymous 12/10/2010 9:27:00 AM

    Thank God for J. Hoberman

  • Steve Conn 12/09/2010 8:43:00 PM

    Scott, Hoberman stresses the film's bravura absurdity because the dancing on hand is a joke, and Portman's technique is a laughing stock for someone who's supposed to be a lead in a leading company's version of Swan Lake. Her line is awful, the carriage all wrong, etc. Aronofsky is using the ballet world as his own psychodramatic playground, but all the CGI in the world can't disguise the inept technique on display, and those looking for a good ballet film might try the Turning Point or even Kanye's Runaway video; all the dancers there are true ballerinas.

  • Dimitris 12/09/2010 3:23:00 AM

    If this review can be blamed for anything it's for describing the film TOO well! JH is the only good reviewer left in this town...

  • scott 12/06/2010 11:27:00 AM

    I'm so enraged and stunned by this review that, like you for a moment here, I lack the capacity for transcribing much of a coherent thought. So then just briefly: you don't mention dancing, really; and you don't mention repression, except in passing. Yet that's all the movie is about. So what are you even talking about? Put down your thesaurus and think, please! Put it another way, I encourage you to respond to a movie as though it were a long and involved idea your friend related to you at a party, something he'd worked on for a year. Would you tell your friend his idea was an 'exercise in bravura absurdity'? Or liken it to some trivial, momentary fantasy of yours (a la Showgirls)? I mean jeez try to remember that you're the guy at the podium here, the sorry bastard who has to go all the way to washington to make a presentation to some infernal congressional committee or other -- and we're the constituents watching on C-SPAN waiting to hear what you have to say, how you're gonna represent us.

  • Robert snyder 12/06/2010 6:25:00 AM

    I haven't seen it yet!

  • anonymous 12/05/2010 12:03:00 AM

    I am seriously starting to believe that film critics do not take cinema seriously as an art form. When a filmmaker attempts to summit a thematically ambitious project in a seriously minded fashion, he or she is labelled pretentious. It is as if film critics do not have the confidence that cinema is a worthy medium through which to explore rich ideas. Critics like Hoberman need to seriously reevaluate their career choice if they lack confidence in the medium.

  • herb 12/04/2010 6:09:00 PM

    Dear J. Hoberman, You must be exhausted after squeezing all of this out through such a small opening. Take a vacation. Somewhere quiet.

  • Lisa 12/02/2010 11:07:00 PM

    OK - I can hardly wait to see Swan Lake. If it is as good as this review is written (I can almost hear the blood-curdling agony of Portman on point) no one with a brain cell in their head will be dissatisfied (or a love for Swan Lake with its haunting beauty). I'm a huge fan of the Wrestler because of it's grittiness and on the edge desperation of the actors (especially Mickey Rourke who deserved all the accolades that accompanied his blood, sweat, and tears that went into filming it). After all the fluff associated with the Twilight series, it is nice to see a more mature approach to female angst!

  • Guest 12/02/2010 8:29:00 PM

    I think the best next movie will be "Wikileaks, the movie: The social leak" Watch the trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6zEz8wPlIQ

  • Lara 12/02/2010 12:02:00 PM

    Ma, the old ballet devotee, said "She has people hands, not ballet hands," and Portman's dance body "was like trying to turn a cigar box into a violin." 'Nuff said.

  • Eddie Lew 12/02/2010 8:22:00 AM

    It may be all of the above, or just a wet dream by a pubescent 15-year-old boy. Isn't that what our culture devolved into? Eddie Lew

  • Snake on a Plane 12/02/2010 12:38:00 AM

    Can I just say that "Batshit in a Tutu" sounds like my favorite Samuel L. Jackson movie ever?

 

Find A Film

for free stuff, film info & more!

Find A Coupon

Popular Coupons

Box Office

  1. Safe House, 24.0 mil, 78.3 mil
  2. The Vow, 23.6 mil, 85.5 mil
  3. Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance, 22.0 mil, 22.0 mil
  4. Journey 2: The Mysterious Island, 20.1 mil, 53.2 mil
  5. This Means War, 17.6 mil, 19.2 mil
  6. Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace 3D, 7.9 mil, 33.7 mil
  7. Chronicle (2012/ I), 7.5 mil, 51.0 mil
  8. The Woman in Black, 6.6 mil, 45.3 mil
  9. The Secret World of Arrietty (Kari-gurashi no Arietti), 6.4 mil, 6.4 mil
  10. The Grey, 3.0 mil, 47.9 mil
Movie Title, Weekly Earnings, Total Earnings

Trailers

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy