what a weird view. I see most sensible people have refrained from responsing to this.Prolly in case it is a scrapeboxed spam sent to every available forum, but it is so outlandish and untrue that I feeel duty bound to respond.For a start this definition of 'white countries' which can only mean western and central europe because once one moves outta those environs, the rest of the world is comprised of nations whose indigenous people are not white.Yet in many of those nations, contrary to what the lunatic poster above proposes, the populations of many of them are white, in a lot mostly white with the indigenous population wiped out or nearly wiped out.
Take england whose population at 2001 was approx 49 mill. Englander white population 45 million leaving 4 mill unwhite.Compare that to the US a non-white nation - yet far more than 4 million persons of english descent live in the US probably 20% of the US population has english heritage, say 80 million people. Of the rest most are also white - either Saxon or Celt, having nearly obliterated the indigenous population and agressively prevented natives from other parts of the americas from entering their phoney whitefella 'nation'.So 4 million unwhite people live in england yet in just one of the many nations england has exported persons to has 20 times that number of englanders.The drongo above things the problem is with unwhites?
Don't be letting any facts get in the way of your spurious arguments bloke.